I actually saw that which is why I started this thread.Matt Park @MattPark1
.@CoachMarrone was awesome at his PJ's luncheon today. He's got answers and a lot of work ahead. Come and listen if you can some Monday.
Matt Park @MattPark1
.@CoachMarrone was awesome at his PJ's luncheon today. He's got answers and a lot of work ahead. Come and listen if you can some Monday.
I actually saw that which is why I started this thread.
If I remember correctly, the info from the lunches are not to be posted here. Your request for the PM is your best bet.
And why in the hell can't we talk about a public luncheon on this forum? Its not privileged information...
Cool. Thanks for the update. Something needs to happen.I was at the Lunch...Not sure what Park is exactly talking about and from what I can tell he says much of the same stuff in the BE coaches conference call that he is on right before. He took full responsibility as has been stated in another thread and said there will be changes...espec. around the red zone...Expect to see our version of the "Bus" to finally get off of the bench...
I'm just curious why it took 4 games to figure this out. He had all of spring and fall practice and 4 games to realize that running a sweep with Smith isn't our best chance to score? It just doesn't make sense.I was at the Lunch...Not sure what Park is exactly talking about and from what I can tell he says much of the same stuff in the BE coaches conference call that he is on right before. He took full responsibility as has been stated in another thread and said there will be changes...espec. around the red zone...Expect to see our version of the "Bus" to finally get off of the bench...
Agreed. Literally anyone with $10 to pay for a hamburger can go to these things. It's not some super duper secret meeting with only top-level boosters or alumni. I didn't go, but if I had I would post everything he said without hesitation. Anyone that would argue the contrary is nuts.
and if you did,you might be paying 10 bucks for a lunch w/o marrone
Was there anything stopping an enterprising young Pitt GA from attending today?
I'm just curious why it took 4 games to figure this out. He had all of spring and fall practice and 4 games to realize that running a sweep with Smith isn't our best chance to score? It just doesn't make sense.
I like DM and am rooting for him to succeed but at this point it is tiring hearing the same thing every week, blah, blah, blah...lets play well and win some games.
i have been to many lunch time meetings,have you? Marrone is smarter than that to give out game plans to upcoming opponets.He gives out good info about the previous games and the what happened and the whys,but not to the future. That was not a very good gotcha question
That's a good explanation, but the problem with that is that Smith is SLOW. He has to know that Smith isn't going to get the edge, even if we fool them they probably have enough make up speed.I may not agree with the call, but I know what the idea was. We got stuffed against SB using the same grouping and trying to punch it up the middle. Gave Minny the same group hoping they would expect the same thing and crash the middle. Unfortunately #13 didn't buy it and stayed home and keyed on Smith outside.
If we had Gulley in, the thought was provably that Minny would expect something wide. Maybe the best play would have been Gulley up the gut.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
In the past he requested certain things be kept off message boards. He talks to people in the room as if they are trusted friends.Agreed. Literally anyone with $10 to pay for a hamburger can go to these things. It's not some super duper secret meeting with only top-level boosters or alumni. I didn't go, but if I had I would post everything he said without hesitation. Anyone that would argue the contrary is nuts.