OrangePA
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 10,364
- Like
- 16,642
I believe that the argument only looks at Time Of Possession. Yes, they were on the field longer. But, did they really need to play a lot more plays? As long as the other team was running a traditional offense then they were also able to substitute... unlike their opposition's D.
Now, if both teams were to run a NHHU offense then it would wear on both defenses.
I am pretty sure that the statistic was number of plays - I'm pretty sure about that but don't know for certain.
The Eagles defense was on the field for the equivalent of three additional games - based on the number of plays run - this past year.
And that has been the case apparently since Kelly took over.
I haven't studied it but that is one of the issues that has been bandied about in Philly.
Last edited: