bnoro
Lurker
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 11,976
- Like
- 36,771
I don't want to get in a pissing match with you but you're discounting the fact that the Celtics started horrendously and then once Doc shortened the rotation they started rolling. The Knicks chemistry is also terrible compared to the Celtics.I'm not, the Knicks had a ton of injuries as well.
I don't think the Knicks were that far behind Boston last year, and if they get Nash, I wouldn';t be surprised if the Knicks finish ahead of Boston this year. And if we get home court, we might even win a round in the playoffs!
To me, missing losing Jeff Green to injury isn't a huge deal. (They also lost Wilcox, I believe). Bradley was a tough one, he seemed to be really coming into his own, especially as a shooter. But Ray Allen? He's 36 years old; that's part of what you get when you have such an old team.
If the Knicks had one one more game and Boston had ended up as the 7 seed and the Knicks played Atlanta in round 1, I think both teams would be looked at very differently. Boston would have lost in round 1 and the Knicks would've had a chance to win at least a round.
Losing Jeff Green was a HUGE deal. He was our backup 3/4, and without him Sacha Pavlovic and Marquis Daniels got PT, which should have never happened. Wilcox was having a decent rebounding season and was what the C's needed in the paint. Those two losses were huge. Same with Bradley. He was a big part of the team and Keyon Dooling is not even close to him as a player.
All your ifs are just insane. Sports have ifs. The Knicks might have had another game and lost it. Not arguing further on this.