RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,824
- Like
- 99,691
So you're saying - followed by a question mark at the end - usually means a question has been asked. Obv I'm looking for confirmation of what you're saying. Are you calling the ACC coach of the year a buffoon? Does that mean in your opinion that the 24 who voted for him were hoodwinked by a buffoon? Seems simple enough to answer with a yes or no. I'm assuming you're claiming him to be a buffoon this year as well as in past years. As long as I'm asking, what's your evidence?
First of all, here's what you actually said:
So you're saying that a highly mediocre buffoon who hasn't lived up to his hype (didn't know he came with hype) is the ACC coach of the year with 24 of the 53 votes cast, three times that of the second-place coach, and who coached the defensive player of the year.
Where was the question mark? It looked like you started to form a question, only to instead end your post with an incomplete statement that cut off in the middle. So there was no "oby" question to respond to.
Second, I don't need evidence--it is my opinion. If you want to base the full measure of you opinion only on this year, then be my guest. Mine is that he got labeled as a future stud coach after getting a very early start as an extremely young coach, dating back to when he was involved with AAU. He gained a [largely undeserved] reputation as a stud recruiter while at the University of Arizona, and was trumpeted by many as a coaching prodigy. In reality, I think that the reality is that he's a lot like Bob Diaco, who had the same reputation as a football AC at Notre Dame, but in reality couldn't recruit when he was at UConn instead of at a powerhouse elite school that sold itself, and had questionable [at best] coaching acumen.
My "evidence" in support of that belief is what occurred subsequent to when he was then hired by Memphis to replace Calipari. Memphis was hoping to catch lightning in a bottle with him and sustain the success, but he was a middling flop. He had an OK year at Georgia Tech, on a team that thrived on defense but failed [in all likelihood] to get into the NCAA tournament. So while I'm fine giving him a golf clap for earning ACC COY, it is important to keep in perspective that GT was generally mediocre, which fits my opinion of his coaching capabilities.
He reminds me a little of Lane Kiffin [although not at the same level in terms of obnoxiousness]. Off the court, he's smarmy [again, my opinion only]. On the court, he hasn't shown that he can win with any consistency. In fact, most people were surprised when he got hired by Georgia Tech. Maybe he'll prove to be a good hire, maybe he won't. Maybe he'll disprove my opinion about him being a mediocre coach, maybe he won't. But his career isn't entirely / solely defined by winning ACC COY.