I'm curious to know why you think we
"should've" won at Clemson? They had 28 first downs to our 12. We were dominated in the 2nd half, and only scored because Clemson's punt returner muffed the catch and we punched it in from 9 yards out afterwards...on 4th down, early 4Q. Clemson had a few muffs that game in the turnover department.
That score was the only score we had in the second half, and, it was gifted to us. Otherwise, we had absolutely no semblance of any offense in that 2nd half, and physically dominated.
Maybe, you meant could have?