OrangeJohn
Walk On
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2015
- Messages
- 111
- Like
- 145
Do any of you envision a future in the Dino Babers era where we regularly expect to beat these teams? If so, what year do you expect us to turn the corner?
Pitt and NC State are doable this year. With this offense I could see year 2-3 beating them regularly, a lot of mid-low ACC teams are going to have lots of issues keeping up with this O.Do any of you envision a future in the Dino Babers era where we regularly expect to beat these teams? If so, what year do you expect us to turn the corner?
Well...I expected this before Dino is all I can bring to this conversation.
Do any of you envision a future in the Dino Babers era where we regularly expect to beat these teams? If so, what year do you expect us to turn the corner?
Ummm, immediately?
I'm not sure Louisville, with Petrino, should be included with the other two.
HRE Otto IV said:This is a weird question. Two years ago we came 3rd in the Atlantic but now we can't compete? NC State blows. We should beat them more often than not. Pitt is a toss up going forward. Louisville will be interesting. Petrino IMO has disappointed thus far. They came in 3rd by default not because they earned it. NC State is mediocre at best. BC, Cuse, and Wake sucked the last two years. They haven't had a lot to work with on O. But this is year three of Petrino II so you would expect to see something. If not then it won't take much to put Louisville with Pitt as a toss up going forward.
This is a weird question. Two years ago we came 3rd in the Atlantic but now we can't compete? NC State blows. We should beat them more often than not. Pitt is a toss up going forward. Louisville will be interesting. Petrino IMO has disappointed thus far. They came in 3rd by default not because they earned it. NC State is mediocre at best. BC, Cuse, and Wake sucked the last two years. They haven't had a lot to work with on O. But this is year three of Petrino II so you would expect to see something. If not then it won't take much to put Louisville with Pitt as a toss up going forward.
we have better talent on D that BG, we have lesser talent at the skill spots than BG, if the Scheme makes our players play just a bit better then we beat UV and Pitt last year and go bowling. if the young D plays better we are right there with all those teams. at worst the skill kids we just got to verbal are Ish/Estime/fredericks/phillips level, having 3-4 more of those types make the offense better just by replacing kids and thats if the kids coming back dont get any better. now add scheme and hopefully more plays at a faster pace, the numbers show we can make a 10pt jump. keep the QB healthy and we can be 3-8 win team even with the same level of D.
Ish88888 said:I respectively disagree regarding our skill guys. They are as good if not better than BG skill guys, Most of our current in rotation skill guys had other p5 offers, Ish, Erv, Bris and Lewis are far More Talented . Consider the fact they played with 4 or 5 different qbs in 2 years and against ACC talent. The MAC plays defense like the NBA, The BG system schemed the BG recievers open, the Edelman effect in the Pats system.