JAXCUSE
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,012
- Like
- 931
If limited to only 10, hard to quibble with that list...Brady
Favre
Manning
Montana
Baugh
Graham
Unitas
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Are the QBs.
If limited to only 10, hard to quibble with that list...Brady
Favre
Manning
Montana
Baugh
Graham
Unitas
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Are the QBs.
Brady
Favre
Manning
Montana
Baugh
Graham
Unitas
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Are the QBs.
Nah, he doesn't need this.No Eli??
pretty much every football thread turns into a discussion of Eli and/or the Patriots.Nah, he doesn't need this.
He'll be fine when he's putting on his gold jacket.
And please everyone - this will NOT turn into a "Yes he will"/"No he won't" thread.
Favre was a gunslinger back in an Era analytics weren’t important.Legend of Brett Favre > Player Brett Favre
Favre was a gunslinger back in an Era analytics weren’t important.
He won 3 MVPs in a row. That is why those sportswriters put him on the team. He hurt his team in big games.
Should Brees and Rodgers be ahead of Marino?I admit I am biased, but Brees has had a longer peak and has never had below average years with the Saints. Favre led the league in INT’s 3 times and had playoff games he totally imploded. I remember a game in the playoffs against the Rams where he threw like 5 picks. I think Brees and Rodgers should both be ahead of him.
Edit: I would have Steve Young on the team over Favre too. He won 6 passing titles before analytics were inportant.
Should Brees and Rodgers be ahead of Marino?
Yeah, I could go either way on Rodgers...although there aren’t many QBs I’d rather have in there with the game on the line.I’m fine with Marino. He played with terrible defenses much like Brees has.
I’ve never been a huge Rodgers guy. I think we are seeing he’s already on the downside. Still better than Favre though IMO.
I think Favre benefitted from the media loving him as he was kind of the every mans QB, from a small town, grew up poorer, and struggled with substance abuse. People definitely have a soft spot for him.
I have sort of flip flopped on Favre over the years. So many people say overrated now that it's almost gone too far, he's like the modern Namath.
Who the heck was even on those peak GB teams anyway; Sharpe's career ended early & Robert Brooks was his #1 guy who got hurt in the SB year. Antonio Freeman & Dorsey Levens in bad weather isn't a spot where you just plug in a qb and own the 49ers & compete with the elite teams.
The 6int Ram playoff game I actually kinda respect how he doesn't care about his stat line once he gets down 24pts or whatever; a lot of guys pad their stats there and have no shot to win. The int in NO when his Viking team had the game is the sort of killer you can't make an excuse for. Still that was a great year & one or two fewer Peterson fumble would've also done the trick.
Wasn’t there a controversial call or two in that game?Favre cost his team the 2010 NFC title game to the Saints with Minnesota with soul crushing INTs.
Wasn’t there a controversial call or two in that game?
Controversial non-calls then? I remember thinking the Vikes were screwed in that one, even before we heard about Bounty Gate.That was the bounty gate game.
Wasn’t there a controversial call or two in that game?
Only thing that screwed Minnesota was NO won the OT coin toss kicked a FG on the first possession and Minnesota didn’t get a possession. Nowadays you have to score a TD in OT for that NO kicked a 40 something yard FG in OT.Controversial non-calls then? I remember thinking the Vikes were screwed in that one, even before we heard about Bounty Gate.
No he won’t !Nah, he doesn't need this.
He'll be fine when he's putting on his gold jacket.
And please everyone - this will NOT turn into a "Yes he will"/"No he won't" thread.