blizz
Hand-off Specialist
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,561
- Like
- 6,552
I did a quick-back-of-the-napkin calc on this: Roughly 7.4 times a year. Standard deviation of 1.3.No how many times do we need to go through this.
I did a quick-back-of-the-napkin calc on this: Roughly 7.4 times a year. Standard deviation of 1.3.No how many times do we need to go through this.
Oh. Thought he was talking about Mandel Robinson.Robert Washington, Jr.
A lesson learned, to be sure...
Or you could be like Louisville and give all the players 69.Would love to see someone with a 6 that's a spinner. What if a 6 turned out to be a 9?
No idea how you'd synchronize front and back though...
I wouldn't do it weekly, but maybe if we attain something like a New Years 6 bowl or even the playoffs, and there is a player who is worthy of the number for that special game. And only when the team or team captains vote to let the player wear that number...Make it very special.I actually think it would be cool to make it an honorary thing weekly like what VTech did with Beamer's number previously. Hand it out as an award each week to wear it vs giving it out to a specific kid. Thus it essentially remains retired but still is used as a symbol.
I'd actually like to hear Jim and Floyd's thoughts on the matter.
"To un-retire something, there has to be a commercial aspect to it," Brown said. "So if it's going to help the team commerciall or help a scholarship fund or something like that, then that's good. But for me, to endorse something that takes away something from you, that doesn't make sense. Unless I did something to deserve it. It seems like a punishment to me. I don't take it that way, but it couldn't be a positive thing unless someone explained it so all of us could see the positive aspect of it."
The one down the street from me here in MA closed... It was terrible.. Maybe just poor management/chef?
That's exactly what I thought.I wonder if Eisen asked him what he thought about the commercial aspect of retiring it in the first place as a desperate attempt to sell tickets for the worst team in program history.
To me, in college football, you retire jerseys, not numbers.
To me, in college football, you retire jerseys, not numbers.
Should we give Adams the number next year?
Using 44 was a neat recruiting tradition once, but it's long dead now. What bugs me (a little) is who's the 44 up in the "rafters" for? All the 44's or just the big 3. Shouldn't there be (3) 44's up there if it's just for the big 3? ...and the garbage bag look of them is awful. Maybe there will be an upgrade with the new roof.
No, they want to wear their own numbers that they've worn their whole life."Using 44 was a neat recruiting tradition once, but it's long dead now"
How do you know that?
Are you suggesting that young players today would not find the legends of Brown, Davis, Little and even Owens and Konrad interesting or intriguing?
No, they want to wear their own numbers that they've worn their whole life.
That seems a little absolute. And likely to conflict with others on the team.
44 should never die. If a kid learns the history and wants to wear it, great. If that doesn't happen for 10 years, it doesn't mean it has to be in the rafters forever (or in this case, 7 years between Konrad playing and Gross doing ticket promotions).
Right. I agree.
When the right kid learns about the history of the number and has the ability and drive to do it, he should be given the chance to wear No. 44.
It's good for the Program - it is a story.
And awarding the number would embrace the original idea - that the No. 44 jersey be a living tribute the GOAT - Jim Brown.
It's a retired number.
Between the original topic and the Carraba’s sub-theme possibly one of 2018’s more ridiculous threads.
AMEN, these perennial threads about 44 get dumber and dumber.
That does a grave disservice to the current "SU slapping everybody across the face with the rip off bowl package" thread.