Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 46,674
- Like
- 134,309
Couldn’t tell by reading this dumpster of a board lately…
Couldn’t tell by reading this dumpster of a board lately…
Really decent chance they are both in the top 50 by the end of the year just because they will be playing for a powerhouse program that is always wildly successful. That makes you look good. Hopefully they actually get more college ready as well.Got to think there is a real chance Q shoots up even more before he steps foot on campus.
We have a good class. 2022 was supposed to be a top 5 class. Two decommitts puts a damper on things. That can all.be saved with another commit or two.
Probably not the best to list a ratings update where both of the current verbals were downgraded to make your point. The same ratings update where Kyle Filipowski was upgraded to #5 nationally. Oh and both of the previously committed verbals are rated higher than the 2 current committed verbals.Couldn’t tell by reading this dumpster of a board lately…
They'd have to start getting upgraded and not downgraded since both were downgraded in this ratings update. Taylor dropped 11 spots.Really decent chance they are both in the top 50 by the end of the year just because they will be playing for a powerhouse program that is always wildly successful. That makes you look good. Hopefully they actually get more college ready as well.
Probably not the best to list a ratings update where both of the current verbals were downgraded to make your point. The same ratings update where Kyle Filipowski was upgraded to #5 nationally. Oh and both of the previously committed verbals are rated higher than the 2 current committed verbals.
Are you trying to say JB and company thought KFlip will be a good player?Probably not the best to list a ratings update where both of the current verbals were downgraded to make your point. The same ratings update where Kyle Filipowski was upgraded to #5 nationally. Oh and both of the previously committed verbals are rated higher than the 2 current committed verbals.
If typical is accurate, then it’s typical.typical.
I would hope players that the staff offer and pursue strongly are players they think will be good players.Are you trying to say JB and company thought KFlip will be a good player?
Regardless, we have two good recruits so far which is the start of a good class.If typical is accurate, then it’s typical.
If you're going to pick a ratings update as the basis for a Rah Rah post, you should at least pick one where the recruits are upgraded. If you care about ratings, going from 56 to 65 and 85 to 86 shouldn't be cause for celebration lol.
It's a good class but everyone here had their sights set on an all time great class. If this is just the start thats great. If this is it it's a big time letdown.Regardless, we have two good recruits so far which is the start of a good class.
Let’s see how they close it out.
It's a good class but everyone here had their sights set on an all time great class. If this is just the start thats great. If this is it it's a big time letdown.
Is recruiting over?
No but if i had a good feeling we were in good shape to land a big fish id feel much better.Is recruiting over?
They usually are but I was confused why you are using an example of someone blowing up after Syracuse offered as a negative on the staff and/or the post you commented on.I would hope players that the staff offer and pursue strongly are players they think will be good players.
No but if i had a good feeling we were in good shape to land a big fish id feel much better.
I hear what you are saying, but you can compete with any team with a roster full of top 100 players. So long as they make it to senior year and you have good coaching.I like our recruits, but I don’t think it makes a lot of sense to crow about getting a 60 and an 80 when that’s what’s consistent with us being a middling ACC team.
“Top 100” is our new baseline?
I like our recruits, but I don’t think it makes a lot of sense to crow about getting a 60 and an 80 when that’s what’s consistent with us being a middling ACC team.
“Top 100” is our new baseline?
That's great, but with our team, if we want to improve our chances at advancing to the top of the league, 'lottery tickets' like Kadary aren't the way. And we're not Gonzaga. Few accomplishes amazing things without high-ranked HS talent. They'd be great in any conference, but they're not in the ACC. I can't even name another team in their conference. Or their conference... : (Last year we had one guy in the top 100(89) and everyone flipped out that he transferred.
And the National Champs had zero guys in the top 60.