I don’t know how companies get away with unpaid internships. We pay ours 50k prorated.I interned in college and did it on my own nickel just for the experience. What ever happened to paying your dues? I still think all this will come full circle after the damage is done and there will be a serious a$$ biting for all involved.
Steak and eggs….Lemme guess…
They aren’t… basically. Get colleges out of professional sports.Why should the services of a college athlete be worth so much less than a professional athlete when the participation of college athletes generates millions of dollar in revenue and we as fans consume both with equal glee? What difference does it make if they're in college or not?
There's really no reason other than "that's the way it's always been", which in itself is a very naive statement.
They aren’t what?They aren’t… basically. Get colleges out of professional sports.
You asked why are they worth so much less.They aren’t what?
Administrators should have thought of this before they started negotiating TV contracts.They aren’t… basically. Get colleges out of professional sports.
Got it. Unfortunately, treating college athletes as professionals in everything but salary is a ship that sailed a long time ago.You asked why are they worth so much less.
I’m an optimist. Right the wrongs… don’t just keep perpetuating a system that is getting “progressively” more corrupt. Start minor leagues. Drop every D1 school back to amateur status. It could happen. Maybe it can’t happen. But nothing good is going to come of this.Got it. Unfortunately, treating college athletes as professionals in everything but salary is a ship that sailed a long time ago.
NFL is a for profit business with franchises making private profits for private people with a CBA with a unionWhy should the services of a college athlete be worth so much less than a professional athlete when the participation of college athletes generates millions of dollar in revenue and we as fans consume both with equal glee? What difference does it make if they're in college or not?
There's really no reason other than "that's the way it's always been", which in itself is a very naive statement.
What am I picking and choosing? I don’t care what the purpose of making the money is or what it’s used for. The point is that money is made off of labor without any cash going back to those who create the value. The free education thing is laughable - anyone here who would work full time hours for no direct financial compensation while the organization they serve makes millions off of that labor is either a moron or lying.NFL is a for profit business with franchises making private profits for private people with a CBA with a union
University's are 501C3's where there is no ownership and profits get reinvested to fund many other non revenue sports and non athletic investments in educational infrastructure. You are trying to pick and choose what's the same without recognizing significant differences. If players claim a free education under 501C3 statutes they shouldn't be able to ask for more money. Pay them money and then have them pay for their own education ensuring academic propriety and standards. Then the façade of this new dysfunctional world starts to regain some manner of respect
Stop saying they were unpaid. They were paid the large expense of attending college which is hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's ok you say that is underpaid but it is factually incorrect to say they were unpaid.What am I picking and choosing? I don’t care what the purpose of making the money is or what it’s used for. The point is that money is made off of labor without any cash going back to those who create the value. The free education thing is laughable - anyone here who would work full time hours for no direct financial compensation while the organization they serve makes millions off of that labor is either a moron or lying.
Bargaining for how the owners and competitors split revenues is a sticking point in every professional sport. I’m applying the same arguments here - there’s a reason the institutions are fighting player organization so hard, because they know they’d lose.
Is it payment though? Attending school is a requirement for participation. A player doesn’t directly receive the tuition money and can’t use it for anything aside from classes and only at the assigned institution. So what are they really gaining there? Plus, that class work requires extra effort on top of an already full time job (being a football player.)Stop saying they were unpaid. They were paid the large expense of attending college which is hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's ok you say that is underpaid but it is factually incorrect to say they were unpaid.
That's the crux of it. In america (and other countries too) we care more about someone's god given physical attributes and how they allow a small percentage of people to do impressive but meaningless things more than we do about people performing necessary but unentertaining services. How much we care about these things funnels gross amounts of money to those entities.You did not have unique abilities that help make your employer tens of millions per annum. I would bet if the same experience could have been had for pay, you would have opted for pay.
Which is more than some colleagues of mine in higher education make with advanced degrees (i.e., Master's+).I don’t know how companies get away with unpaid internships. We pay ours 50k prorated.
Then eliminate the educational aspect, and operate as a minor league outside the schools. No more using the school names to advertise games.What am I picking and choosing? I don’t care what the purpose of making the money is or what it’s used for. The point is that money is made off of labor without any cash going back to those who create the value. The free education thing is laughable - anyone here who would work full time hours for no direct financial compensation while the organization they serve makes millions off of that labor is either a moron or lying.
Bargaining for how the owners and competitors split revenues is a sticking point in every professional sport. I’m applying the same arguments here - there’s a reason the institutions are fighting player organization so hard, because they know they’d lose.
You seem to imply that the players wouldn’t be able to handle that.Then eliminate the educational aspect, and operate as a minor league outside the schools. No more using the school names to advertise games.
No more free room and board, each player pays for housing, and meals, and pays his agent to find them a team.
If you aren't playing up to standard you get cut from the team.
Well bill, the difference is that they are playing one of the most popular sports in the country with people paying millions to watch/broadcast, while you probably worked at the local accounting firm doing data entry.I interned in college and did it on my own nickel just for the experience. What ever happened to paying your dues? I still think all this will come full circle after the damage is done and there will be a serious a$$ biting for all involved.
Most 18 or 19 year olds have no clue how to manage money for food, housing, and all the other things in their every day life.You seem to imply that the players wouldn’t be able to handle that.
Yes, it's payment. Part of the compensation package for most jobs are things that can't be converted to cash. Health benefits can only be used for healthcare. I know people that work for hospitals that must use their benefits at institutions within the system they work for. If they seek care outside of that they don't get covered. And yes, the student athletes have to do the classwork, just like the students PAYING for the classes. Access to the classes is compensation since it is something others pay for. And at least some of these athletes have the added benefit of relaxed admission standards compared to nonathletes. There is value in that that is difficult assign a dollar amount to. As someone that attended Lemoyne, I'm sure you understand that having the opportunity to attend a more respected institution has value. Also, to say they recieve no cash is inaccurate. All of them receive stipends as part of their scholarship. Mike Golic pointed that out years ago on his radio show. When you have no living expenses, a stipend can be stretched pretty far.Is it payment though? Attending school is a requirement for participation. A player doesn’t directly receive the tuition money and can’t use it for anything aside from classes and only at the assigned institution. So what are they really gaining there? Plus, that class work requires extra effort on top of an already full time job (being a football player.)
And sure, a degree MAY be beneficial down the line. But free tuition yielding a $100,000 a year salary 10 years after graduation is hardly worthwhile compensation for a guy who generates 6 or 7 figures of value at the age of 20 and doesn’t see a dime of it.
And yet minor league baseball exists. And if a pro system for 18-19 football players existed, agents and other support systems would exist to help. (They already do.)Most 18 or 19 year olds have no clue how to manage money for food, housing, and all the other things in their every day life.
My health insurance is considered a benefit, not direct compensation. And I don’t work exclusively for that health insurance - I work to make money.Yes, it's payment. Part of the compensation package for most jobs are things that can't be converted to cash. Health benefits can only be used for healthcare. I know people that work for hospitals that must use their benefits at institutions within the system they work for. If they seek care outside of that they don't get covered. And yes, the student athletes have to do the classwork, just like the students PAYING for the classes. Access to the classes is compensation since it is something others pay for. And at least some of these athletes have the added benefit of relaxed admission standards compared to nonathletes. There is value in that that is difficult assign a dollar amount to. As someone that attended Lemoyne, I'm sure you understand that having the opportunity to attend a more respected institution has value. Also, to say they recieve no cash is inaccurate. All of them receive stipends as part of their scholarship. Mike Golic pointed that out years ago on his radio show. When you have no living expenses, a stipend can be stretched pretty far.
If they think it's an unfair trade off, they don't have to attend as student athletes.
Not for nothing… but,Is it payment though? Attending school is a requirement for participation. A player doesn’t directly receive the tuition money and can’t use it for anything aside from classes and only at the assigned institution. So what are they really gaining there? Plus, that class work requires extra effort on top of an already full time job (being a football player.)
And sure, a degree MAY be beneficial down the line. But free tuition yielding a $100,000 a year salary 10 years after graduation is hardly worthwhile compensation for a guy who generates 6 or 7 figures of value at the age of 20 and doesn’t see a dime of it.
Yes and? That’s supposed to be adequate compensation when conference TV rights are worth 8 figures a year?Not for nothing… but,
Men with bachelor's degrees earn approximately $900,000 more in median lifetime earnings than high school graduates (ssa.gov)
Not necessarily. But it’s not nothing. And for 99% of college football players it’s more significant than some meaningless NIL pocket change. It could be life-changing.Yes and? That’s supposed to be adequate compensation when conference TV rights are worth 8 figures a year?