Janner
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,538
- Like
- 3,997
We are done for this cycle.
Would the staff be open to a traditional transfer at this position if a suitable one became available?
We are done for this cycle.
Its amazing a few people don't get that recruiting is a 2 way street. We have needs, identify them and go after them. That's what we did with OO for 3-4 weeks. OO has needs or desires and criteria also. Look at his recruiting timeline. He commits to LaSalle. Their coaching staff convinces him he needs a prep year. So he goes to prep for a year. After prep school he remains committed to LaSalle. The LaSalle staff gets let go. OO stills wants to stay at LaSalle, but according to his prep coach things didn't "work out", whatever that means. So he opens his recruitment. He has SB, SU, GTown, Virginia Tech, Pittsburgh and one other wanting him. He chose SB. Why? Even if he didn't like SU, why didn't he even give Pitt or VT the time of day? If you haven't talked with him then you're making the assumption his criterion doesn't mean anything. What if HIS criteria was immediate PT? What does JB say to him when they meet to discuss HIS criteria? Maybe his teammate recently committing to LaSalle also played a role? Some of you think all we need to do is snap our fingers and disregard what is in the players head.
Griff has been an assistant for multiple programs. We know he has a body of work. The question for you is has GMAC earned his spot ?
Bees think we have an understanding of how this works . The topic here is an underachieving recruiter who some want to lead this program
Bees think we have an understanding of how this works . The topic here is an underachieving recruiter who some want to lead this program
Gmac has only closed a couple of kids. This cycle is going to be very telling.That's the opinion of a few fans. Not the people that count. We had ~20 offers this cycle. Were they all GMac recruits?
Gmac has only closed a couple of kids. This cycle is going to be very telling.
just retitle it "all inclusive recruiting dumpster fire thread"Osunnyi recruiting thread to be locked in 3...2...1...
bees I couldn't agree more with you the past few pages. I like GMac a lot and think he is fine - I think (I don't feel this way) that people still can't get over Quade and that more than anything has led to this GMac bashing. GMac could have done NOTHING different in the QG recruitment, but if we ended up getting him I think people wouldn't talk about GMac at allThat's the opinion of a few fans. Not the people that count. We had ~20 offers this cycle. Were they all GMac recruits?
bees I couldn't agree more with you the past few pages. I like GMac a lot and think he is fine - I think (I don't feel this way) that people still can't get over Quade and that more than anything has led to this GMac bashing. GMac could have done NOTHING different in the QG recruitment, but if we ended up getting him I think people wouldn't talk about GMac at all
Griff has been an assistant for multiple programs. We know he has a body of work. The question for you is has GMAC earned his spot ?
bees I couldn't agree more with you the past few pages. I like GMac a lot and think he is fine - I think (I don't feel this way) that people still can't get over Quade and that more than anything has led to this GMac bashing. GMac could have done NOTHING different in the QG recruitment, but if we ended up getting him I think people wouldn't talk about GMac at all
Where was he going to play and for whom?
Us wanting a kid doesn't necessarily mean he would have played next year.
Would the staff be open to a traditional transfer at this position if a suitable one became available?
When both our returning centers are coming off injuries, I think it's a pretty good bet he would have seen some quality time over the course of 35 games or so.
“So he’s scared to compete for playing time then!”Maybe he doesn't want to bank on one of our other C's to get injured to have to earn PT?
Maybe he doesn't want to bank on one of our other C's to get injured to have to earn PT?
but you are betting with his money. he is the one with skin in the game, not you, and he didn't see it that way.When both our returning centers are coming off injuries, I think it's a pretty good bet he would have seen some quality time over the course of 35 games or so.
I agree with this. I don’t think there is a Problem yet. If we strike out next year, that’s when we know there is a problem.Just my two cents, but I think it would be far more productive to put all our efforts into getting a BIG TIME center for 2019. We swung and missed in 2018 with big guys. It shouldn't happen. It stinks, but it is what it is. Playing time will not be an issue in 2019, so if we whiff again, and don't land on a 4-5 star big guy next class, IMO there will be some explaining to do.
Its amazing a few people don't get that recruiting is a 2 way street. We have needs, identify them and go after them. That's what we did with OO for 3-4 weeks. OO has needs or desires and criteria also. Look at his recruiting timeline. He commits to LaSalle. Their coaching staff convinces him he needs a prep year. So he goes to prep for a year. After prep school he remains committed to LaSalle. The LaSalle staff gets let go. OO stills wants to stay at LaSalle, but according to his prep coach things didn't "work out", whatever that means. So he opens his recruitment. He has SB, SU, GTown, Virginia Tech, Pittsburgh and one other wanting him. He chose SB. Why? Even if he didn't like SU, why didn't he even give Pitt or VT the time of day? If you haven't talked with him then you're making the assumption his criterion doesn't mean anything. What if HIS criteria was immediate PT? What does JB say to him when they meet to discuss HIS criteria? Maybe his teammate recently committing to LaSalle also played a role? Some of you think all we need to do is snap our fingers and disregard what is in the players head.