I'm not one to be pessimistic generally, but If this is the best we can do for forwards this year I find it highly, highly disappointing. You would think with the potential openings we have in the front court (we may not have a single returning forward) that we could have locked in a top 50 forward, or maybe two - if we were back to our old days of recruiting. I mean how hard of a sell job can it be when you look at how bare the front court may be next year. Yes he's got some potential, but we should be locking in stud forwards with the playing time we could offer.
Head guy is about 77 years old now and plays 2 of his kids, and their friends from their AAU club.
Lots of guys transferred out the last 2 years (4 and 4) - transfer portal or not, guys who were guaranteed to be starters, or important contributors, left the program.
That's what 100 other schools are saying about us right now.
I think we are doing quite well, given the reality on the ground, with us now being a perennial bubble team who always makes a run as a Cinderella to the Sweet 16. This is our national brand now. We are a mid-tier ACC team, with a soon to retire coach.
If we wind up with a class of a likely 4 star 6-6 PG and a 6-6 SG who are both going to IMG for a prep year to play together, we get a nimble big man who is 7 feet tall, dribbles like a guard and is always attacking the rim, you add an athletic PF with some size like Maliq Brown, or that other guy who was blowing up this summer, I forget his name, but he was pitched as a 5 when he was more like an athletic 4/5. Then there's Bunch out there, a pretty decent wing.
If that's what we end up with, that's still a top 20 class, and fills a lot of needs with players who are clearly "good enough" and most will probably be here 2 o 3 years. You need classes like this every few years to build out your roster, so you have a "team" to assemble around the "stud" players.