longtimefan
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,613
- Like
- 11,759
The "NCAA amateurism process". Now there's a wild card. Could take 48 hours, or 48 days. As KU is the subject, I expect he'll be on the court for their next game.
The "NCAA amateurism process". Now there's a wild card. Could take 48 hours, or 48 days. As KU is the subject, I expect he'll be on the court for their next game.
Yup, the NCAA, that’s one fine organization.
This is a —ed up ridiculous ruling. The NCAA is the worst. They run a kangaroo court, they punish kids without evidence, and the programs like KU and Zona and the the administrators there get off scot free.
This is a —ed up ridiculous ruling. The NCAA is the worst. They run a kangaroo court, they punish kids without evidence, and the programs like KU and Zona and the the administrators there get off scot free.
That's the case that led to this ruling. After Newton (or his family) got away with it, they said "No more". So now if a family member gets paid, the athlete gets punished.Cam Newton say hi.
It sounds like there is some evidence in this case, although I admittedly don't know any more than what was in the statements in this thread.This is a —ed up ridiculous ruling. The NCAA is the worst. They run a kangaroo court, they punish kids without evidence, and the programs like KU and Zona and the the administrators there get off scot free.
Not at all. After the Newton fiasco, they changed the rule.So it's okay that Cam Newton's dad took money, but not this kids' guardian?
It sounds like there is some evidence in this case, although I admittedly don't know any more than what was in the statements in this thread.
Or, in true NCAA fashion where it comes to the blue bloods, they will punish their women's team.Not at all. After the Newton fiasco, they changed the rule.
As an aside, I noticed that Fox sports reported the first payment was made by a KU booster. I wonder if that
could lead to penalties for KU. Or if they're just going to come down on the player.
There is testimony given under oath at trial from the person that paid the family member. So, saying no evidence is untrue. I believe the facts here are no one denies the payments. Rather the opposition finds the punishment too severe. Under the rules, the player could be banned for life, but they mitigated it to two years. He will have 1.5 to play.