Class of 2019 PG Cole Anthony (NY/Oak Hill) to North Carolina

721Comstock

All American
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
4,904
Like
14,576
Cole aAnthony is a highly regarded recruit.. ever wonder why SU has not gotten far in recruiting him. Or is it because Boeheim is happy with getting Goodine and for awhile in recruiting Lecque.
Recruiting is a 2-way street.

I'd imagine that our staff got the idea that Cole wasn't very interested, or looking for a BLUE blood program only, so they moved on.
 

Cusefan0307

A very millennial millennial
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
20,889
Like
39,185
Honestly I'll be shocked if he doesn't end up at Duke.
 

JHarris44

Scout Team
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
280
Like
321
If I'm Greg Anthony, I'm sending my kid to a program with a proven (recent) history of sending PG's to the League.

Unfortunately, be it perception of system (2-3 zone only) or the lack of quality NBA guards Syracuse has outputted over the last 10-15 years, I have no ill-will towards being left out.

Plus it appears to this fan that this Orange outfit (to steal a phrase from an old "friend") is forming up to be the deepest in recent memory (since i started following the program in 1995-96).
 

Jzsshuttles

Walk On
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
189
Like
455
Recruiting is a 2-way street.

I'd imagine that our staff got the idea that Cole wasn't very interested, or looking for a BLUE blood program only, so they moved on.
Syracuse is a blue blood
 

AZOrange

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,062
Like
15,764
Yeah but if Cole Anthony wants to come to SU Boeheim is taking him with open arms, regardless of who is on board.
That’s now how that recruitment went
 

721Comstock

All American
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
4,904
Like
14,576
Syracuse is a blue blood
No, we're not.

We're in the next tier below the Blue Blood level, which is fine.

We don't consistently get Top-10 (or even Top-25) level recruits.
We're not a fixture in the Top 25 almost every year (at least recently, but this will change now)
We haven't won multiple NC's.
We haven't even won our Conference championship in ages.
 

Trueblue25

Cali Award Magistrate
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
22,079
Like
32,547
Duke UNC Nova Kentucky Kansas

Syracuse Louisville Michigan

Uconn Florida UCLA MSU

Arizona etc.

Im missing someone arent i
 

Trueblue25

Cali Award Magistrate
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
22,079
Like
32,547
How tasty is Arizona’s loss to UB paired with MSU kicked to the curb by JB, still to this day?
 

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
Yeah, I think Nova is probably on Tier 1 now.

Tier 1- Duke, UNC, Kentucky, Kansas, Villanova (?)

Tier 2- Syracuse, Arizona, Louisville, UCLA, Indiana, Michigan, MSU.

Tier 3- UConn, Florida, Virginia, Ohio St., Wisconsin, Gonzaga, etc.

I don’t know. This stuff is so subjective.
 
Last edited:

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
How tasty is Arizona’s loss to UB paired with MSU kicked to the curb by JB, still to this day?
It’s cool for sure. Wasn’t a surprise to me at all that UB won and I liked Arizona a lot. We barely beat them and they improved a ton. Arizona had lead guard weaknesses and UB defended them really well and hard (I wonder if UA fans said they played dirty, btw, lol). Buffalo also gave Kentucky a tough game for most of it before UK prevailed. SGA was incredible. The MSU game was a complete shock. I thought our ride would be over especially playing in Detroit. Very cool.
 

Jzsshuttles

Walk On
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
189
Like
455
No, we're not.

We're in the next tier below the Blue Blood level, which is fine.

We don't consistently get Top-10 (or even Top-25) level recruits.
We're not a fixture in the Top 25 almost every year (at least recently, but this will change now)
We haven't won multiple NC's.
We haven't even won our Conference championship in ages.
Yes we are.
 

maxxyz

Starter
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,087
Like
1,742
Yeah, I think Nova is probably on Tier 1 now.

Tier 1- Duke, UNC, Kentucky, Kansas, Villanova (?)

Tier 2- Syracuse, Arizona, Louisville, UCLA, Indiana, Michigan, MSU.

Tier 3- UConn, Florida, Virginia, Ohio St., Wisconsin, Gonzaga

I don’t know. This stuff is so subjective.
I would swap Villanova and UCLA. While Villanova has had great success they aren't of the "blue blood" category. And likewise UCLA, which has had much less success for a decade, is still in that high stratosphere of big alumni money and big influence. And big apparel money.
 
Last edited:

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
I would swap Villanova and UCLA. While Villanova has had great success they aren't of the "blue blood category. And likewise UCLA, which has had much less success for a decade, is still in that high stratosphere of big alumni money and big influence. And big apparel money.
Yep. I was thinking about that exact same swap, actually.
 

Jzsshuttles

Walk On
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
189
Like
455
Tell us how according to Comstock’s valid criteria?
Valid criteria? Haha. Not getting top 10-25 talent every year is far from valid. Let’s see..there’s 300 plus division 1 basketball programs in this country. Syracuse is 6th all time in wins. Syracuse is one of the top 8 programs all time. Every top 10 list that ESPN or cbs has come out with always has Syracuse top 8-9. It’s not an arguement. A few bad years doesn’t take away from 100 years of basketball. Just like you putting nova in the top 5 is a complete joke. They’ve been really good for 4-5 years now they’re on the same level as Duke Kansas and Kentucky? Stop.
 

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
Valid criteria? Haha. Not getting top 10-25 talent every year is far from valid. Let’s see..there’s 300 plus division 1 basketball programs in this country. Syracuse is 6th all time in wins. Syracuse is one of the top 8 programs all time. Every top 10 list that ESPN or cbs has come out with always has Syracuse top 8-9. It’s not an arguement. A few bad years doesn’t take away from 100 years of basketball. Just like you putting nova in the top 5 is a complete joke. They’ve been really good for 4-5 years now they’re on the same level as Duke Kansas and Kentucky? Stop.
We can always agree to disagree. We’re not in the tier as the blue bloods (Duke/UK/Kansas/UNC) but in the next tier. My the horrors! I have no problem swapping UCLA with Nova. But we aren’t in that top tier of 5 or so, IMO.
 

ssbriefcase

All American
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,438
Like
5,376
No way is Nova a blue blood. To say that is ignoring decades of basketball, and the work top tier teams have put in throughout history
 

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
No way is Nova a blue blood. To say that is ignoring decades of basketball, and the work top tier teams have put in throughout history
The more I look at it the more they have a case, IMO. I can see both sides but...

64-36 All Time in the Tourney
37 Tourney Appearances- 8th all time
1985/2016/2018 Champs. 1971 Runner-up
Four BET Championships

Those are just some of the accomplishments. Tourney appearances in the 70s and 80s so historically relevant. I guess it boils down to how heavy one weighs the Titles.
 
Last edited:

longtimefan

All American
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
5,043
Like
4,445
The more I look at it the more they have a case, IMO. I can see both sides but...

64-36 All Time in the Tourney
37 Tourney Appearances- 8th all time
1985/2016/2018 Champs. 1971 Runner-up
Four BET Championships

Those are just some of the accomplishments. Tourney appearances in the 70s and 80s so historically relevant. I guess it boils down to how heavy one weighs the Titles.
Nit-picking (actually, much more than nits).

1971 NCAA runner-up vacated due to ineligible player.

3 of 4 BET titles in the New BE. I would guess that if SU, LVille, and even ND (not to mention UConn & Cin) were still competing in MSG, Nova would not have all 3 of those recent titles.
 

SU Dreaming

been real...not really
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
730
Like
2,465
he is more than likely going to G-Town, if not Duke, we had zero shot
 

SoBeCuse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,153
Like
14,815
Nit-picking (actually, much more than nits).

1971 NCAA runner-up vacated due to ineligible player.

3 of 4 BET titles in the New BE. I would guess that if SU, LVille, and even ND (not to mention UConn & Cin) were still competing in MSG, Nova would not have all 3 of those recent titles.
Good points in that paragraph. I think they are probably second tier just making some points.

Vacated whatever is bunk. Louisville, Syracuse, USC football, whomever. The players played and earned whatever accolades occurred. The games happened.
 

longtimefan

All American
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
5,043
Like
4,445
Good points in that paragraph. I think they are probably second tier just making some points.

Vacated whatever is bunk. Louisville, Syracuse, USC football, whomever. The players played and earned whatever accolades occurred. The games happened.
Howard Porter was being paid. If he's not on the court, they do not make the FF.
 

Online statistics

Members online
57
Guests online
283
Total visitors
340

Top Bottom