OttoinGrotto
2023-24 Iggy Award Most 3 Pointers Made
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 62,908
- Like
- 184,640
5 out of... 10? 5? Eleventy 6?CB to SU just came in. Listed as a 5 in confidence level.
5 out of... 10? 5? Eleventy 6?CB to SU just came in. Listed as a 5 in confidence level.
Eventually people will pick up on this hahahaOnce peach jam ends, things will get very clear with recruits like Cope and JJ
10. Or maybe it IS Eleventy 65 out of... 10? 5? Eleventy 6?
I agree that JJ is an elite prospect as a 2 and not quite as good as a 1. Considering our roster next year should have both Girard and Symir on it, if the staff thinks JJ is the best available player, I think they should go after him hard and worry about a pure 1 next year if landing him causes the other point guards we are looking at to lose interest in us.Peach Jam is highlighting that JJ is more of a 2 than a lead guard.
So what do you do if you're the SU coaching staff. Would love to land BOTH Cope and JJ -- but concerned about the combo guard dilemma if we throw all of our eggs into the JJ basket.
It's a muddled picture. On the one hand, it seems like Copeland - who projects as a pure PG/distributor - has the length and talent to upgrade the position and really likes us. Since JJ seems to be a slasher/scorer/SG in the Dion mold (per RF's post), Copeland may not view him as an obstacle - more likely it's the other two seniors (to be) at the same position (JG3 and ST). However, as others have posted, Copeland has a much bigger upside than either of the two ahead of him. And even as a frosh he could carve out minutes, depending on how well the seniors are playing and how quickly he adjusts. It's a log jam that might not bother Copeland as much as people think (he gets the keys to the car his soph. year), and a "problem" the staff would love to have.I agree that JJ is an elite prospect as a 2 and not quite as good as a 1. Considering our roster next year should have both Girard and Symir on it, if the staff thinks JJ is the best available player, I think they should go after him hard and worry about a pure 1 next year if landing him causes the other point guards we are looking at to lose interest in us.
JJ and Kamari are two of the most complete scorers we've ever recruited. Landing them both in the same class would be special.
As much as I like Copeland (which is a lot) he doesn't fit on our roster as well as JJ would because Copeland and Symir really shouldn't be on the court at the same time, somebody would end up unhappy with their minutes.
Peach Jam is highlighting that JJ is more of a 2 than a lead guard.
So what do you do if you're the SU coaching staff. Would love to land BOTH Cope and JJ -- but concerned about the combo guard dilemma if we throw all of our eggs into the JJ basket.
Oh man, General I love most of your posts, but... I disagree with this a lot.I agree that JJ is an elite prospect as a 2 and not quite as good as a 1. Considering our roster next year should have both Girard and Symir on it, if the staff thinks JJ is the best available player, I think they should go after him hard and worry about a pure 1 next year if landing him causes the other point guards we are looking at to lose interest in us.
JJ and Kamari are two of the most complete scorers we've ever recruited. Landing them both in the same class would be special.
As much as I like Copeland (which is a lot) he doesn't fit on our roster as well as JJ would because Copeland and Symir really shouldn't be on the court at the same time, somebody would end up unhappy with their minutes.
I agree that JJ is an elite prospect as a 2 and not quite as good as a 1. Considering our roster next year should have both Girard and Symir on it, if the staff thinks JJ is the best available player, I think they should go after him hard and worry about a pure 1 next year if landing him causes the other point guards we are looking at to lose interest in us.
JJ and Kamari are two of the most complete scorers we've ever recruited. Landing them both in the same class would be special.
As much as I like Copeland (which is a lot) he doesn't fit on our roster as well as JJ would because Copeland and Symir really shouldn't be on the court at the same time, somebody would end up unhappy with their minutes.
Agreed that JJ is an elite scorer. Reminds me a little of Jamal Murray.
I'm of the mindset that Symir -- while a nice pivot after Kadary transferred -- is a candidate to be recruited over. The problem [and admittedly, this is a first world "problem"] is class size and expectation for immediate PT from the players we're bringing in for class of 2022.
If we can land JJ and Copeland as a prospective starting backcourt, and Cope is willing to bet on himself over Symir / Joe, then that would be amazing. If Copeland gets turned off by JJ plus the guys ahead of him -- well, that sucks, but you take JJ and PG becomes a high priority for the class of 2023.
I'm not really worried about Taylor. I don't see him starting over JJ, if Buddy leaves after this year. But even so, that might only be a one-year delay, and Taylor could still play a lot. If JJ doesn't come here, then presumably Taylor "shifts" to 2 and we take Copeland to play alongside him.
If we land Bunch, I see it similarly. Great future component who might have to wait a year for his turn.
Similarly, I could see Lands playing either forward slot [he wouldn't play 2 over JJ], so he and Taylor could be compatible. Kind of like how we started CJ / Southerland for awhile in 2013. Neither was a PF, but they both could get the job done and compensated with versatility.
Question all comes down to how big of a class. We have two in the fold. Do we add one more guard [along with Taylor], or two? And do we land Bunch even though he'd come in behind in the pecking order [on paper] to Lands / Taylor?
Presumably, we'd only have room for one big in this class.
Again, great "problems" to have.
"Room" in a class almost doesn't even matter anymore, here in the post-Portal world.
Seems virtually a given that somebody, or several somebodies, who still may have eligibility left, will depart for - elsewhere.
So -
Worry about how and where they'll fit in later.
I'd be surprised about Symir. He's already used his immediate eligibility transfer.Honestly could see 1 or both of Symir and JG3 head out after next year
I'd be surprised about Symir. He's already used his immediate eligibility transfer.
Joe wouldn't really have any reason to go.
I agree with all this. I'd just add, I don't think there is any way we say no to either Copeland or Starling. If both want to come, great.Agreed that JJ is an elite scorer. Reminds me a little of Jamal Murray.
I'm of the mindset that Symir -- while a nice pivot after Kadary transferred -- is a candidate to be recruited over. The problem [and admittedly, this is a first world "problem"] is class size and expectation for immediate PT from the players we're bringing in for class of 2022. And if Symir / Joe rise to the occasion and solidify the lead guard position for the next two years, then that's terrific.
If we can land JJ and Copeland as a prospective starting backcourt, and Cope is willing to bet on himself over Symir / Joe, then that would be amazing. If Copeland gets turned off by JJ plus the guys ahead of him -- well, that sucks, but you take JJ and PG becomes a high priority for the class of 2023.
I'm not really worried about Taylor. I don't see him starting over JJ, if Buddy leaves after this year. But even so, that might only be a one-year delay, and Taylor could still play a lot. If JJ doesn't come here, then presumably Taylor "shifts" to 2 and we take Copeland to play alongside him.
If we land Bunch, I see it similarly. Great future component who might have to wait a year for his turn -- but a guy who could be a big time contributor in our system when he finally gets his chance down the road.
Similarly, I could see Lands playing either forward slot [he wouldn't play 2 over JJ], so he and Taylor could be compatible. Kind of like how we started CJ / Southerland for awhile in 2013. Neither was a PF, but they both could get the job done and compensated with versatility.
Question all comes down to how big of a class. We have two in the fold. Do we add one more guard [along with Taylor], or two? And do we land Bunch even though he'd come in behind in the pecking order [on paper] to Lands / Taylor?
Presumably, we'd only have room for one big in this class.
Again, great "problems" to have.
I agree with all this. I'd just add, I don't think there is any way we say no to either Copeland or Starling. If both want to come, great.
The only real question is, will adding one scare off the other? I don't think any of us know the answer to that. My guess is it might. These are guys who are going to have a lot of good options.
If we land either one of the two we've secured a great class in my opinion, no matter who else we get or don't get.
Playing time might be the issue for JG, given the talent we might have available at the guard spots.Joe wouldn't really have any reason to go.