They have a good D but I think they’re overrated. As someone mentioned, we stopped that offense for 3 quarters & had plenty of chances. We mostly stopped ourselves with self inflicted wounds.Hard to get a read on their D.. We had no oline and yet should have been ahead by 2 TDs and Lou just does what they do which is hope the skill guys break huge plays 3-4 times a game and let QB run around and throw up home run balls.
To be fair there were many of us who thought Maryland was legit at the timeDoes this fall in the same category as when you predicted Maryland was going to contend for B10 title last year?
Louisville's offense didn't fare any better against Pitt than we did the week before.If we had Louisville’s offense we beat Pitt.
Pitt isn’t a top 25 now.
They are a 8-4 team in a normal year.
That if they were in the SEC would be overrated nationally but because they are in the ACC are underrated.
Give Dino the quarterback from Louisville I think we beat Pitt.Louisville's offense didn't fare any better against Pitt than we did the week before.
I posted these stats in another thread:
SU offense: passing (13-24, 120 yds); 51 yds rushing (1 INT, 7 sacks)
Llville offense: passing 9-21, 107 yds, 116 yds rushing (3 INTs, 7 sacks)
When did that happen?Does this fall in the same category as when you predicted Maryland was going to contend for B10 title last year?
To be fair there were many of us who thought Maryland was legit at the time
Not that it matters but after that game I was crushed for saying at the end of the year they wouldn’t be competing for the title.
I think at times the board looks at losses to teams and tries to build those teams up to make our loss look not as bad.
Pitt is not that good ... Clemson and ND will handle them relatively easily.
That defense is for real and can make it a game with anyone.
To beat Clemson you need a defense that can keep the score within reason.
Pitt has that.
Not that it matters but after that game I was crushed for saying at the end of the year they wouldn’t be competing for the title.
I think at times the board looks at losses to teams and tries to build those teams up to make our loss look not as bad.