Class of 2023 - QB LaNorris Sellers (SC) Flipped to South Carolina | Page 97 | Syracusefan.com

Class of 2023 QB LaNorris Sellers (SC) Flipped to South Carolina

I think this an easy case of recency and confirmation bias. The plays worked because of the execution of an incredibly talented QB not in spite of him. For some reason you are just ignoring the obvious. We were 7-2 in one score games, same plays with any other QB we lose 4-5 more games.
If Beck stayed on as OC this year, I do not think we'd have anywhere near the success we've had with Nixon this year.

And if we had Nixon last year, he would've figured out a way to get the ball out quicker so Shrader wasn't running for his life every play before getting injured.

I would love to see Nixon call an offense for a dual threat QB and I'm excited to see it next season.
 
If Beck stayed on as OC this year, I do not think we'd have anywhere near the success we've had with Nixon this year.

And if we had Nixon last year, he would've figured out a way to get the ball out quicker so Shrader wasn't running for his life every play before getting injured.

I would love to see Nixon call an offense for a dual threat QB and I'm excited to see it next season.
Whatever, doesn't matter. We're 10-3 and changing the reality of the past can't be done.
PS: McCord's coming back next year...:p
 
Interesting to perhaps only me, but our old QB commit apparently made $3.7 million last year.

IMG_0423.jpeg
 
She’s a marketing machine and probably the only legit influencer of the group. Not sure what’s creepy about it.
She deserves the money she makes, sure, that's the point of NIL. She can take advantage of her name, image, and likeness in a way that most other athletes cannot.

But how is it "well worth every cent"? She has never come close to the individual podium in her time at LSU. She wasn't even a competitor for their national championship winning team this year.

Sorry if I misconstrued the point, but to "well worth every cent" came off as creepy.
 
She deserves the money she makes, sure, that's the point of NIL. She can take advantage of her name, image, and likeness in a way that most other athletes cannot.

But how is it "well worth every cent"? She has never come close to the individual podium in her time at LSU. She wasn't even a competitor for their national championship winning team this year.

Sorry if I misconstrued the point, but to "well worth every cent" came off as creepy.
She's kind of the modern day Anna Kournikova but less skilled in her sport than Anna was in the grand scheme
 
She deserves the money she makes, sure, that's the point of NIL. She can take advantage of her name, image, and likeness in a way that most other athletes cannot.

But how is it "well worth every cent"? She has never come close to the individual podium in her time at LSU. She wasn't even a competitor for their national championship winning team this year.

Sorry if I misconstrued the point, but to "well worth every cent" came off as creepy.
She's the only one on the list that is THE face of a national brand and in every commercial for them. I'd have no idea that Vuori existed if not for her commercials.
 
If you paid her 5 mill in NIL would you have gotten 5mill in value from that? Who paid her the NIL? Was it that company she is in the ads for?
 
She deserves the money she makes, sure, that's the point of NIL. She can take advantage of her name, image, and likeness in a way that most other athletes cannot.

But how is it "well worth every cent"? She has never come close to the individual podium in her time at LSU. She wasn't even a competitor for their national championship winning team this year.

Sorry if I misconstrued the point, but to "well worth every cent" came off as creepy.
The irony is that her NIL is actually being used as intended - companies paying her because her likeness is a marketing tool. Many of the others are just regurgitated booster payments under the new model.

I get that her athletic performance isn’t necessarily driving the marketing opportunity (say as if you dumped a Caitlin Clark back into college hoops), but the NIL is being provided for the companies to gain from a marketing perspective rather than to influence her to go to a school.
 
If you paid her 5 mill in NIL would you have gotten 5mill in value from that? Who paid her the NIL? Was it that company she is in the ads for?

It would be the SEVERAL companies that she has NIL Deals with.


I think she is worth every single penny.


It seems everyone knows who she is and just about every man wants to look at her.

Her and Paul Skenes are a power couple.
 
The irony is that her NIL is actually being used as intended - companies paying her because her likeness is a marketing tool. Many of the others are just regurgitated booster payments under the new model.

I get that her athletic performance isn’t necessarily driving the marketing opportunity (say as if you dumped a Caitlin Clark back into college hoops), but the NIL is being provided for the companies to gain from a marketing perspective rather than to influence her to go to a school.

Yes, she is doing EXACTLY what NIL is supposed to be.



As a reminder, college kids were not allowed to take any $$$ from advertisers previous to this. This is why you now see them in commercials etc. Anytime you see a college athlete in a commercial or anything like that, that is how NIL was supposed to be. Not the collectives etc.
 
She's the only one on the list that is THE face of a national brand and in every commercial for them. I'd have no idea that Vuori existed if not for her commercials.
I am not into fashion at all but somehow have this weird ability to buy active wear before it becomes popular. I’ve had Vuori stuff for years now but my fiancee used to be a Nordstrom stylist and like 6-7 years ago I bought On sneakers and I remember her asking me why I bought these “old man sneakers”. Guess you also has Ons now? Lol :D
 
Yes, she is doing EXACTLY what NIL is supposed to be.



As a reminder, college kids were not allowed to take any $$$ from advertisers previous to this. This is why you now see them in commercials etc. Anytime you see a college athlete in a commercial or anything like that, that is how NIL was supposed to be. Not the collectives etc.
I’m curious how much of the NIL estimates we see on lists like this are collective driven vs advertisers. That would be an interesting statistic.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,084
Messages
5,326,333
Members
6,225
Latest member
cuse_1997

Online statistics

Members online
326
Guests online
3,281
Total visitors
3,607


Top Bottom