RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,906
- Like
- 100,207
We beat one of the worst Duke teams in the last 40 years
True. They were only ranked #20, which is probably their nadir in the last 40 years.
We beat one of the worst Duke teams in the last 40 years
We were 11 point underdogs and won. Nuff said.We beat one of the worst Duke teams in the last 40 years
There were at least a few on this board who said or somewhat implied that this Cuse team was the worst in some 40 years (laughable), plus other naysayers.
What say you now?
Don't give up on the team you love so easily!
As long as we can't get Igor, I want to stick with JB.I don't think anyone thought they were the worst team in 40 years but that under Hopkins for stretches they just looked useless on both sides of the ball. What today's win shows is how good Jim Boehiem is, honestly Coyle should be trying to figure out how to get JB to stay until hes 80.
If this team can shoot consistently, they will be in most games. Problem will be against teams with inside scoring threats. JB was absolutely correct, if they don't hit shots they won't do well. Tonight, they hit shots.
:rolling:I don't think I saw anyone giving up on the team.
While I generally agree with your post, I just quoted your above sentence since this is not the way I took it based on some of the dire verbiage from at least a few folks just a few games ago. Some people (philosophically) are so quick to label something (anything, not just SU bball). I'm not saying this team is by any means a really good team, and they could go right back down the hopper again. The kids are really hustling and trying hard, esp. now. I just like to keep a more optimistic approach and perspective.I don't think I saw anyone giving up on the team.
No. K quits when his teams stink.
See 94-95 season.
If this team can shoot consistently, they will be in most games. Problem will be against teams with inside scoring threats. JB was absolutely correct, if they don't hit shots they won't do well. Tonight, they hit shots.
My point was not to call anyone out (sorry). I just feel it's too easy to kick someone when they are down vs. letting it all play out, then decide.You're quoting me when you say this is one of our worst teams in the past 40 years.
At the time I said it, it was accurate. They're starting to turn a corner. Still a long, uphill battle to go. However, a game like tonight gives them a pulse.
Still have to find a way to win 6 or 7 more games. Let's hope they can continue to improve.
What's the ceiling for this team, creeping into the NCAA's? That alone puts them in the lowest 25% of our teams in the past 40 years.My point was not to call anyone out (sorry). I just feel it's too easy to kick someone when they are down vs. letting it all play out, then decide.
Also, when you say "at the time, it was accurate." How does one decide the worst in 40 yrs (or any time period)? Mid-season performance (how can we compare that vs. many other years), or end of season record/performance? I think you wait before labeling, then fairly label good or bad at the end. And, if this team was THAT bad, then they wouldn't be turning a corner, right? (which we hope they will continue turning).
Anyway, we're all happy they won. Let's hope it continues. Thanks.
What's the ceiling for this team, creeping into the NCAA's? That alone puts them in the lowest 25% of our teams in the past 40 years.
I'm proud of them for winning at Cameron though. Great accomplishment.
I'm a die hard fan with Final Four expectations as the standard every year. It's the standard for the UK's, Dukes, UNC's and KU's of the world so it should be ours as well.
My point was not to call anyone out (sorry). I just feel it's too easy to kick someone when they are down vs. letting it all play out, then decide.
We beat one of the worst Duke teams in the last 40 years
Seriously? Really?We beat one of the worst Duke teams in the last 40 years
I'm a die hard fan with Final Four expectations as the standard every year. It's the standard for the UK's, Dukes, UNC's and KU's of the world so it should be ours as well.
There were at least a few on this board who said or somewhat implied that this Cuse team was the worst in some 40 years (laughable), plus other naysayers.
What say you now?
Don't give up on the team you love so easily!
In terms of talent...this is probably the least Boeheim has ever had to work with.There were at least a few on this board who said or somewhat implied that this Cuse team was the worst in some 40 years (laughable), plus other naysayers.
What say you now?
Don't give up on the team you love so easily!
And this team, IMO, is better than the '13-14 team we beat in that Dome thriller
I don't know where this Duke team ranks. However, this was a game that I think most of us (myself very much included) predicted would be a loss. Getting the win makes the road to 9 or 10 wins that much more possible.This is the worst duke team since 2007.
This is a really great win.
Both these statements can be true.
Plumdumm really killed us inside tonight. If he didn't go nuts inside, then we would have handled Duke tonight.
This was Coleman's first poor game in awhile. Hopefully he will bounce back and show more as a rebounder / defender, because as you point out we're going to need more from him.
There were at least a few on this board who said or somewhat implied that this Cuse team was the worst in some 40 years (laughable), plus other naysayers.
What say you now?
Don't give up on the team you love so easily!