Vshukla
Walk On
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2016
- Messages
- 196
- Like
- 976
100% agree on Gibson. Even in his MVP year the guy hit .290 with 25 HR and 76 RBI. His reputation is based on 1 memorable moment. He’s the Bizarro version of Bill Buckner. Buckner was a better player than Gibson, but he is unfairly remembered for 1 bad play rather than the entirety of his career.Kirk Gibson has always been interesting to me. I feel like there are people who absolutely love him and I just don't get it. Played 16 seasons. Only played more than 130 games 4 times (half his seasons less than 100 games). Never hit more than 30 home runs, never had more than 100 RBIs (the standards before the steroid/juiced ball eras), never made an all-star team and won NL MVP but Strawberry should have won it in '88. He will always be revered because of 1 play (that play was what won him the MVP). Take away that home run in the World Series and he is nothing more than an average MLB baseball player.
Of course, here the talk is college. Strangely, he was known in college as a All-American WR in football. Baseball was a secondary sport for him.