HRE Otto IV
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2016
- Messages
- 7,947
- Like
- 13,184
I have no dog in this fight, but I think it should be exclusively about tenure...the priority should be how LONG a season ticket holder has been one...and not about how much $ they contribute. I mean, there can be another layer to ensure that people stay roughly within their current tier (someone in the 100s should not be arbitrarily bumped by someone in the 300s), but a 20 year season ticket holder should not be bumped behind someone who is a 1 year STH but who happens to be wealthy.
Just my 2 cents.
Yes and no.
One it should be by section. Then you need to balance tenure, donations, and current row.
Someone shouldn't be able to come into one's section and get the best seat just because they donated more money this season. But for 90% of the Dome this will be a non factor anyway. Some rich person isn't going to go grab the first row of the $99 seats.
At the same time just because someone is 80 years old and has been coming longer than someone 50 years old, that shouldn't take precedent. Plus for SU that 50 year old will have a longer future fandom.
And if someone is sitting in row 17 and another is in row 3, that person in row 17 shouldn't be able to move ahead. Heck they had the chance to move to row 17 at some point did they not?