They are getting penalized for the NET gaming joke OOC schedule.The selection committee members shouldlose their jobs. Iowa State easily deserved a 1 seed. Not only did they not get a 1 seed but they got put in the toughest region too.
Same.I have not been as impressed with my Aztecs this year, but I think they will avoid the 5-12 loss against UAB. Then Auburn will end it, however. Can’t see anyone beating U Conn in the East, or anywhere, honestly
I can see Iowa State as a 2. I can’t see them in the same bracket as UCLOWN. That part is ridiculous.
I just don’t think they are the worst #2, which was what the committee has basically said.I don't see any reason for them being lower than a 2. There's no 4th team that has close to the resume as them.
Yep!There’s you 5-12 upset. Bye Wisky
UNC and Duke always get preferential treatment. Iowa St. isn’t name brand enough to be a one when the resumes are so close.I don't see any reason for them being lower than a 2. There's no 4th team that has close to the resume as them.
I posted this last night in another thread.
North Carolina has 3 top 25 NET wins - #6 Tennessee, #10 Duke, #10 Duke
Iowa State has 5 NET top 25 wins - #1 Houston (28 pt. win), #1 Houston, #13 BYU, #14 Baylor, #16 Kansas.
Iowa State - 10 quad 1 wins. UNC - 9 quad 1 wins. So what exactly has UNC done to get a 1 seed over them?
North Carolina gets constant favoritism from refs, the media and the selection committee. It's beyond a joke.
Either or, they’ll both be out the next round so it’s a low risk pick either wayEveryone will pick JMU over Wisconsin. Not me.
Auburn and Arizona actually had higher net ranking than Iowa State….and NC.UNC and Duke always get preferential treatment. Iowa St. name brand enough to be a one when the resumes are so close.
Yeah I had that same question above. And why the hell is Boise in the play in game in the first place?Houston bracket is 10x tougher than Uconns
and since when was a 10 seed a play in game.