"To me you are more interested..." in ignoring basic stats.
A better midrange game than anyone on the team? As i've said, he does have certain high-level skills that i hope will help him create shot opportunities. Like Buddy did. But, rationalizing his low shot percentage as being a result of playing a "ridiculously competitive high school schedule" ignores that it's still 'just' high school. The competition will be stiffer next year, not lesser.
Back to the comparison vs the current SU team—i would suggest that if you looked at their high school tapes, you'd see some of the same mid-range (and deeper) proficiencies. Moore, specifically. Probably Carlos, as well. You don't score back to back to back to back 70+ games without skills at that level. Since Cuffe was a transfer, i don't recall if i went back to see his HS tape, but you don't go to Kansas without some promise. JJ was kind of a HS star. But, it's how they translate against consistently older, bigger, stronger, faster college players is what decides careers.
There isn't one of us here who doesn't hope Kiyan is/becomes a star. Some of us are more pragmatic, given the numbers he does and doesn't put up at a lower level. As for the characterization that he/we are more interested in "potential deficits," I can only offer this: it's a reaction to the suggestion that Kiyan is some sort of coach saver, that we should be tying another year of Red to maintaining Kiyan's commitment. That's basically it. Everyone is happy he signed with us. Everyone. Some just don't want him to be a program decider or to have the pressure of unrealistic expectations.