This is really simple.
Saying that C.J. "Thickburger" Fair is averaging 2.9 turnovers per game is not a criticism.
Saying that a 1 to 2 assist to turnover ratio is terrible from your senior leader is a criticism.
Saying that Coleman is a 50% free throw shooter is not a criticism.
Saying that Coleman is a bad free shooter is a criticism.
Saying that Buss Patterson has taken 25 shots in 49 minutes of play is not a criticism.
Saying that Patterson chucks it up as soon as he gets in to the game is a criticism.
Some folks on the board are so eager to defend Cooney that they feel the need to respond to things that aren't criticisms as though they are criticisms.
Let's break it down -
Title of the post: Shaky Potatoes Tracker (not a criticism to be found in the title)
Post: After today's game against Pitt (not a criticism), Cooney has now made 11 of 45 three point attempts (not a criticism), a .244 clip (not a criticism), in ACC play (not a criticism).
On the season he is making 41% of his three point attempts (not a criticism).
And then we got to enjoy reading a bunch of posts that must have been in response to something else, since they all gave various defenses for Cooney. Because, remember, my post didn't have a single criticism of Cooney. I guess people want to believe that the mere existence of a post, that doesn't contain a single criticism, actually becomes a criticism thanks to its very existence.
I'm really surprised and a little disappointed that our board is so sensitive and irrational in this case.