I know mine did...shocked we havent heard squat
Not shocked, I am fearful WHY we haven't heard squat.
Without Melo Elite 8 is the absolute ceiling IMHO.
absolute ceiling?
do you really want me to list some of the past final 4 teams? maybe list the last 2 national champions?
why don't you list all of the JB teams that have made it past the Sweet 16 without a low post threat?
you can certainly argue 2003, possibly 1996
Melo was the best low post option in the nation in 2003, and Hak was the team's 2nd leading scoreryou can certainly argue 2003, possibly 1996
2003 Had McForth, both of whom were 1000x more of a threat than Baye "fumbles" Keita.
Yeah, 2003 doesn't work at all. Melo and Hak were fantastic on the block.
you can certainly argue 2003, possibly 1996
this has to be the 1st compliment of mcforth's scoring threat abilities i have ever seen.
If you notice it is more of a slight to Keita. But Forth got quite a few buckets. He was certainly a threat on a high-low that we needed to win 81-78, wasn't he?
Can Christmas be serviceable enough?
Anyway, like moqui says, we had the best low-post threat in the nation in 2003, so your point is still bunk.
May not be a university hearing, may be NCAA clearinghouse appeal?
which is one reason why I'm not on the bandwagon (and haven't been all season long) even with Fab in the lineup.and its not like fabricio has any low post moves anyway.
What did we lose in Melo? he averages 7 points a game. 6.8 of which are handed to him.
Offensively, our best screener. Not even close. Did you see Keita trying to set picks? Pretty easy to dodge a toothpick, not so much a tree.
Defenseively, well, Cooley is a marginal player and he looked like Dwight Howard against Moose and Rak, didn't he?
Losing Melo for the year would be a death blow to our title hopes, make no mistake about that.
my only point - dont call him a low post threat. he isnt. and if he is lost for the year, its not as big as losing AO IMO. we still are a top 10 team.