I don't see Bullough changing his philosophy much. He seems like the type of DC who won't change his style for anyone, and I don't really blame him. Our safeties have to be smart. If anything, their O-line seems like it could be a weakness so if we're gonna go down then let's go down throwing the house at them forcing them to make plays. I doubt we will see our corners in much man coverage, but it has to be stressed to Wilkes, Eskridge, and Morgan that they have to help deep. Don't bite on the run. I'd like to see Shafer hit Boyd with 19 differently disguised blitzes like he did to Bridgewater and see how Boyd handled it. Bridgewater is ever bit as good as Boyd and you saw what happened to him.
My guess is we'll see the same scheme we witnessed last year against USC. Cover 3, cover 4 between the 20's. We will bring pressure on 2nd and 3rd and long. We are not going to keep Clemson from scoring, they are too talented. We need to hold them under 35 or so to have a chance.
I don't see Bullough changing his philosophy much. He seems like the type of DC who won't change his style for anyone, and I don't really blame him. Our safeties have to be smart. If anything, their O-line seems like it could be a weakness so if we're gonna go down then let's go down throwing the house at them forcing them to make plays. I doubt we will see our corners in much man coverage, but it has to be stressed to Wilkes, Eskridge, and Morgan that they have to help deep. Don't bite on the run. I'd like to see Shafer hit Boyd with 19 differently disguised blitzes like he did to Bridgewater and see how Boyd handled it. Bridgewater is ever bit as good as Boyd and you saw what happened to him.
My plan to defend Clemson is thus:
Tackle the Clemson player with the ball.
Yeah he threw for 424 yds.
The reason we beat Lville wasn't because of pass defense or how we blitzed Bridgewater.
In all seriousness though, I wish coaches approached every game with the mindset that it's going to be a shootout and they have to be creative in order to get enough points on the board. This "we knew it was going to be close" mindset is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I agree with the first two paragraphs, but that's on the defensive side of things.The way to beat them is beat them up. Smart blitzes, not bringing six or seven, play coverage behind, hit the QB hard, and shut down the run.
In the wins against WVU, Lville, and WVU the defense held the opponent to 70 (2.9ypc), 48 (2.8), 88 (2.4) yds rushing. You do that you have more chances to win 3rd down and get them off the field.
The offense has to be super efficient and try to limit the number of possessions in the game. The only way they have a chance on offense is running the ball well, like 200 yds well.
No Offense, but you are not scoring more than 14 IMO...you are not Georgia.
SU is not going to win a close shootout with these guys. SU can't compete in a track meet with Clemson.
The way to beat them is beat them up. Smart blitzes, not bringing six or seven, play coverage behind, hit the QB hard, and shut down the run.
In the wins against WVU, Lville, and WVU the defense held the opponent to 70 (2.9ypc), 48 (2.8), 88 (2.4) yds rushing. You do that you have more chances to win 3rd down and get them off the field.
The offense has to be super efficient and try to limit the number of possessions in the game. The only way they have a chance on offense is running the ball well, like 200 yds well.
How did NC State defend Clemson? Or did Boyd just have an off day?
Turnovers.
Guess they'll have to be fumbles. Boyd doesn't throw picks.
the blitzing wasnt the real issue. it was the db's blowing coverages behind it multiple times. hopefully 4 weeks later those mistakes have been cleaned upAgree. Way too much blitzing against NW and we paid the price.