It’s a balance to be sure. Starters give you better special teams results.I would really like to see less starters on specials than we have. We are starting to get thin.
It’s a balance to be sure. Starters give you better special teams results.
yes! absolutely hate to see this. Only so much energy and specials absolutely kills ya and puts them in position to have a greater likelyhood of high speed injuries. Don't like it. If we had alabama/Georgias depth no problem, us, not so much.I would really like to see less starters on specials than we have. We are starting to get thin.
My take is they knew the first four were must wins and went all in. I’d expect to see more of the load being spread after NCSt. That game IS the bowl game.yes! absolutely hate to see this. Only so much energy and specials absolutely kills ya and puts them in position to have a greater likelyhood of high speed injuries. Don't like it. If we had alabama/Georgias depth no problem, us, not so much.
Interesting thought.My take is they knew the first four were must wins and went all in. I’d expect to see more of the load being spread after NCSt. That game IS the bowl game.
I agreeIt’s a balance to be sure. Starters give you better special teams results.
I think using starters on special teams started with Coach Mac.IIRC in the glory days of Coach P it was mostly starters in kick coverage as well even though we probably had more depth back then. And that helped maker us one of the best special teams units in the country many years
and Beamer at VT.I think using starters on special teams started with Coach Mac.