- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,132
- Like
- 195,086
10-30
Are you saying that Hunt was 10-30? For us out of towner's, that can't be right.10-30
Refs didn't throw any interference. A WR got tackled and they didn't even throw a flag. Take today with a grain of salt.
ManYes.
Was there.
Off the top of my head, the guys who stood out for me - Jonathan Thomas, Corey Winfield, Erv Phillips, Devante McFarland, Ishmael, Jamal Custis, Hudson,
I thought Hunt looked pretty good. He threw long better than he ever has. He has a pretty quick release. He looks to be in the best shape of his career. He missed a few, but he seems to be in command.
If he goes down again we will have trouble.
Raymon looks good - no braces on knees - appears ready to play.
Foy looks to be in great shape - longer and more athletic than in the past.
The scrimmage was well run - very efficient - no wasted effort.
The offense was vanilla but efficient - the guys seem to know what they're supposed to be doing.
yes...for 103 yards.Wasn't Wilson 7-10?
I don't have much confidence in the offense right now. The WRs as a unit look good, but someones got to get them the ball. Several times DBs were 10 yards off and there was no audible to a quick hitch (maybe bc the plays were scripted). We couldnt run the ball at all.
Something else that really frustrates me - Its bad enough that we dont have a real spring game, but the fact that our 1's dont go against each other ever is ludicrous.
You wanna see how our O will perform against Pitt, NCST, BC, Clemson, etc - youre best indication of what they can and cannot do is against our best D.
Youve got to figure out a gameplan that works with our O players, against our best D, not the back ups for a team that doesnt have much depth.
[/QUOTE]You would have a better feel than I being there, so I'd err with you. But a couple things:
- Thomas looked really interesting...but really light. Couldn't help but notice him, but man is he skinny.
- Hunt did not seem any more in command on my screen than he did two years ago. He just looked less effective. That said, didn't see him away from the action.
- Foy was old school. Seemed to be lean for sure.
- Lasker seems like he would be an amazing matador in Spain. What am I missing with this guy? He does not seem like a Tackle.
The biggest thing I like from what you said: the O seemed like they knew what they were doing. Huge development versus George McDumbass trying too hard to prove he was a legit OC by confusing people.
OPA, overall, after the game, are you more optimistic or pessimistic for 2015?
[/QUOTE]You would have a better feel than I being there, so I'd err with you. But a couple things:
- Thomas looked really interesting...but really light. Couldn't help but notice him, but man is he skinny.
- Hunt did not seem any more in command on my screen than he did two years ago. He just looked less effective. That said, didn't see him away from the action.
- Foy was old school. Seemed to be lean for sure.
- Lasker seems like he would be an amazing matador in Spain. What am I missing with this guy? He does not seem like a Tackle.
The biggest thing I like from what you said: the O seemed like they knew what they were doing. Huge development versus George McDumbass trying too hard to prove he was a legit OC by confusing people.
OPA, overall, after the game, are you more optimistic or pessimistic for 2015?
He can't catch it for them. He threw mostly very well.10 of 30 from our starting quarterback is atrocious. I don't care how good our defense is. That is a horrible sign.