Pyle
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 3,422
- Like
- 5,440
The ones who ran on here to apologize to Tucker after finding out WMU DQ'd him fit the bill for sure.How can anyone be a "Tucker apologist?" Some on here choose to be logical instead of making a gut reaction based on one source.
It's funny the whole logical, one source comment. Tucker consulted one specialist who later went back on his diagnosis but Tucker stuck with the DQ. Clark was then cleared by a number of other specialists and then cleared by another University's medical team so to me the person who only had one source was Tucker.
The only really logical thing that can be said here, is that we don't have enough information to vindicate Tucker's diagnosis or not. There is currently zero evidence of any correlation between the two DQs.