SU Human Resource Complaint Towards Heather Lyke | Page 9 | Syracusefan.com

SU Human Resource Complaint Towards Heather Lyke




“A December human resources complaint alleged Heather Lyke, a high-ranking advisor and candidate for Syracuse University’s next director of athletics, directed “employees to disregard instructions given by our department’s top leader” and overstepped “the appropriate boundaries of her role.”


Let the games begin…

Someone doesn’t want Heather? I thought she would be named next week. I’m more concerned about her decision to extend Capel at Pitt. The new Chancellor KNOWS the need to win to get money. International enrollment declines have cost them a lot of money. Other schools have done it.
 
Yeah I don’t get the defense of JW here

if I’m hired to run a dept and chancellor thinks so highly of me they bring in another AD who turns out to have a lot of red flags would have been something to Accelerate my retirement

Being loyal because you went to Syracuse means ultimately he was kinda taken advantage of here. If resignation was too drastic I would have used my Thamel hammer to let it be known this is bs

It’s too 11th hour for me now. Along w the we won’t fire Autry because it’s tacky. PC fired English in season. It can be done. They let him finish it off

I guess “revenge is a dish best served cold” is a tough concept for some people. Considering he appears to have imploded Kent’s best laid plans with his approach and got what he wanted in the end (NOTE: I think, although I’m still not 100% sure the administration won’t go out of their way to screw this up and hire her as AD), the most anyone proposing he could have done something differently are saying is “hypothetically, he could have gotten this result faster!” Personally, I’ll go with the real world result over the hypotheticals.

More than likely Red is still here because firing him in season would have cost a bigger buyout and wouldn’t have salvaged anything anyway. Patience was the right choice. It’s clear from your inability to see how well JW played his hand here that you lack it, so it’s unsurprising this is baffling to you.

I remain convinced anyone still critical of JW overall isn’t worth paying any attention to. It demonstrates a lack of any vision of the big picture.
 
Last edited:
I remain convinced anyone still critical of JW overall isn’t worth paying any attention to. It demonstrates a lack of any vision of the big picture.
How would people rate Wildhack's and Syverud's tenure?

Wildhack finished strong. Is well respected outside the Cuse community. Screwed up the Autry hiring (because he basically rolled over on the decision making). Fran seems to be a win, as does FLJ, but Dino and Q didn't end well. Lacrosse hirings seem fine but results underwhelming. JMA Dome upgrades were long time coming. I'd give him a C+ but if the next two hires go well (even though technically they are not his), and Football has a solid 8 or 9 game win season, I'd more him up to an A-.

Syverud. A lot of you are a lot closer to the academic ranking situation than I am, but it appears it dropped. I know the party rankings have dropped and there is a lot of development around campus. Although a lot seems to be private student housing. What's his biggest claim that he can be proud of? Not sure, but in an era where a lot of Chancellors and Presidents ended up in trouble or fired due to how they have handled on campus protest issues, he basically kept Syracuse out of the news. Plus, he parlayed himself into a seemingly better job. For that alone, I give him a B-.
 
This national sports story also includes the report of the HR complaint.

 
How would people rate Wildhack's and Syverud's tenure?

Wildhack finished strong. Is well respected outside the Cuse community. Screwed up the Autry hiring (because he basically rolled over on the decision making). Fran seems to be a win, as does FLJ, but Dino and Q didn't end well. Lacrosse hirings seem fine but results underwhelming. JMA Dome upgrades were long time coming. I'd give him a C+ but if the next two hires go well (even though technically they are not his), and Football has a solid 8 or 9 game win season, I'd more him up to an A-.

Syverud. A lot of you are a lot closer to the academic ranking situation than I am, but it appears it dropped. I know the party rankings have dropped and there is a lot of development around campus. Although a lot seems to be private student housing. What's his biggest claim that he can be proud of? Not sure, but in an era where a lot of Chancellors and Presidents ended up in trouble or fired due to how they have handled on campus protest issues, he basically kept Syracuse out of the news. Plus, he parlayed himself into a seemingly better job. For that alone, I give him a B-.
Academic ranking has plummeted under Syverud, and he said upon taking office it was too low and a priority.
 
Heather Lyke was brought to Syracuse University to drive meaningful transformation in our Athletics Department. That kind of work is difficult and is not always welcomed by everyone. Growth and change can be uncomfortable, but that is very different from a policy violation, and it should not be confused with misconduct.

This part of the SU statement made me chuckle. I've worked with many an executive who was brought in to the company to "transform" things.

The good ones quickly build relationships, immerse themselves in the company culture, and gather advocates for their mission.

The bad ones plow ahead like a bull in the proverbial China shop, surround themselves with sycophants while pissing everyone else off, and inevitably fail.

Lyke clearly is the latter. Doesn't mean she committed HR infractions. But likely means she acted like an a s s, treated people poorly, and made a lot of enemies.

The companies I've been at typically defended the senior exec. It wasn't in their interest to shine a light on their bad hire (unless something egregious/illegal went down). But then that person wouldn't have their contract renewed and would slink away unceremoniously.

I suspect that's what's happening here.
 
This part of the SU statement made me chuckle. I've worked with many an executive who was brought in to the company to "transform" things.

The good ones quickly build relationships, immerse themselves in the company culture, and gather advocates for their mission.

The bad ones plow ahead like a bull in the proverbial China shop, surround themselves with sycophants while pissing everyone else off, and inevitably fail.

Lyke clearly is the latter. Doesn't mean she committed HR infractions. But likely means she acted like an a s s, treated people poorly, and made a lot of enemies.

The companies I've been at typically defended the senior exec. It wasn't in their interest to shine a light on their bad hire (unless something egregious/illegal went down). But then that person wouldn't have their contract renewed and would slink away unceremoniously.

I suspect that's what's happening here.
We hope you're right!
 
This part of the SU statement made me chuckle. I've worked with many an executive who was brought in to the company to "transform" things.

The good ones quickly build relationships, immerse themselves in the company culture, and gather advocates for their mission.

The bad ones plow ahead like a bull in the proverbial China shop, surround themselves with sycophants while pissing everyone else off, and inevitably fail.

Lyke clearly is the latter. Doesn't mean she committed HR infractions. But likely means she acted like an a s s, treated people poorly, and made a lot of enemies.

The companies I've been at typically defended the senior exec. It wasn't in their interest to shine a light on their bad hire (unless something egregious/illegal went down). But then that person wouldn't have their contract renewed and would slink away unceremoniously.

I suspect that's what's happening here.
stairs sam cannon GIF
 
My understanding (haven't read a lot about it admittedly) is: "The top 72 programs, mostly composed of Power Five schools, would play in the Power 12 Conference, split into six, geography-based divisions. The remaining 64 programs, mostly made up of Group of Five schools, would compete in a Group of Eight Conference." Way more than just BiG10/SEC.
Here is a suggestion for these brilliant minds
Stop making things after numbers that always change
 
Why do people give money to schools like this?

Post of me want to just pay off the remaining loans to to the bandaid off and not think to myself I'm still paying for this nonsense
 
This part of the SU statement made me chuckle. I've worked with many an executive who was brought in to the company to "transform" things.

The good ones quickly build relationships, immerse themselves in the company culture, and gather advocates for their mission.

The bad ones plow ahead like a bull in the proverbial China shop, surround themselves with sycophants while pissing everyone else off, and inevitably fail.

Lyke clearly is the latter. Doesn't mean she committed HR infractions. But likely means she acted like an a s s, treated people poorly, and made a lot of enemies.

The companies I've been at typically defended the senior exec. It wasn't in their interest to shine a light on their bad hire (unless something egregious/illegal went down). But then that person wouldn't have their contract renewed and would slink away unceremoniously.

I suspect that's what's happening here.
She was brought into to do something but they're not saying she actually did it. Faint praise
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,769
Messages
5,286,834
Members
6,199
Latest member
JoeRoos

Online statistics

Members online
184
Guests online
4,036
Total visitors
4,220


Top Bottom