BlackKnight76
All American
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 4,473
- Like
- 3,855
Two things:
1) I love your hope for the OL, but I think we are in serious trouble for the year with this group.
I'm forever the optimist, I guess.
2) I really like the way you ended the article. I have been a fan since the mid 80s (basically when I was old enough to realize what football was), so I really have had trouble handling the downturn of the program and find myself with little to no patience when we lose or play like we did against URI. Your perspective is refreshing.
I was definitely one of the people who was saying Bailey shouldn't be a feature back, and I still feel that way. But I think a little clarification is also in order. By feature back, I mean that he shouldn't get 70%-80% or more of the carries. I think he should have to share the load more. Do I think he should get more carries/touches than any other back? Sure. But I don't think that he is big enough or durable enough to take the kind of beating that Delone did the last few years. After Bailey hurt his leg, he didn't look the same. He caught that one pass out of the backfield later in the game and was hesitant and didn't have his burst. We're only in game two. We need that burst. I would have liked for Smith to get a few more carries. PTG looked legit in his touches, and I had reserved judgement until Saturday. It can't be said enough. Delone was always able to fall forward for that extra yard or two. We need to find out if Adonis or Jerome can do the same thing.
The difference between this year and last year... Last year Delone would get 3 yards on a blown assignment. This year we get one. Last year we had no problem running Delone again, and three more yards makes it 3rd and manageable. This year, you pretty much have to pass because you worry about Bailey getting stuffed again, if it's incomplete, Ryan is forced to make a play on a predictable 3-and-long. AT THE VERY WORST, that is what made DC our MVP.