A select few players later success is not evidence that the quick hook is what made them better players. I'd wager that they were that good, or had that potential, all along. There is an article on Syracuse.com about Cooney's work ethic. It's a great read. That is what make him successful, not the early quick hooks.
The Waiters thing is kind of silly. He was what? a top 3 NBA pick?
I sort of get it with guys like Paul Harris, guys with huge potential whom would have these massive brain farts. With Roberson, I just don't get it. While he does seem to have a perpetual poopy face, in the little bit of time I've seen him play, he had a beautiful quick hitter dunk, similar to Ennis to Rak's give an go. He seems game enough to help the team right now. We almost desparately need help at that position. We lose DC and BMK. We have two games in which to offer him more minutes, prior to the Duke and UVA gauntlet. Yet, we tighten our shorts. I guess we are banking, everything, on BMK coming back in full strength. If that does not work out, then we are banking the entire tourney on 6 players, and favorable reffing.
If there is an issue with his attitude, i.e. he won't accept being a role player, then I get it. He's trying to break him down and remold him. If he's trying to punish him for not being perfect, then why are Fair and Grant and BMK given such leeway? Fair is good for 2 unforced errors a game. Grant is good for 3 alligator arm layups a game. BMK the same with bobbles. And all 3 are guilty of not boxing out.
By the way, in the NC State presser JB had something negative to say about everyone, but Fair.
I know it's all a psychological ploy. Just what it is that he is trying to accomplish, I don't quite follow. I don't need to. He's the HOFer. I get all that. Won't stop me from trying to understand it though.