SouthernCuse
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 1,447
- Like
- 2,014
We kicked this around on the NCAA ruling thread a bit, but first the dark humor
lambos for recruits at UT
I really see the pay players ruling as a non event. The idea of paying players for their name and image-related marketing almost seems quaint in today's light. Players are getting so-called 'NLI' payments that have nothing to do with their actual image marketing. Unlike the tailgate initiative, that i supported, but paying hs recruits, who have not even won a starting spot is not going to sell a lot of jerseys.
so its a wild west anyway, are there going to be any rules? imposed by whom? at least a dozen teams think they can outspend everyone else, another dozen probably think a huge alumni whale permits them to play now and again.
Nothing I can do except make sure Syracuse United gets a check, so I guess i have to get on that, now that Consigliere has cleared up the legal issues.
lambos for recruits at UT
I really see the pay players ruling as a non event. The idea of paying players for their name and image-related marketing almost seems quaint in today's light. Players are getting so-called 'NLI' payments that have nothing to do with their actual image marketing. Unlike the tailgate initiative, that i supported, but paying hs recruits, who have not even won a starting spot is not going to sell a lot of jerseys.
so its a wild west anyway, are there going to be any rules? imposed by whom? at least a dozen teams think they can outspend everyone else, another dozen probably think a huge alumni whale permits them to play now and again.
Nothing I can do except make sure Syracuse United gets a check, so I guess i have to get on that, now that Consigliere has cleared up the legal issues.