The Anatomy of a Rebuild — the Player(Part 1) | Syracusefan.com

The Anatomy of a Rebuild — the Player(Part 1)

CIL

All Conference
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
3,042
Like
9,802
Another football season has passed, and we are going without another bowl game. This marks the fourth consecutive Syracuse season without a bowl, and 7th out of our last 10. These last few season have appeared to be even more taxing on the Syracuse fan, as we have seemingly “turned the corner” with upset wins, only to be led into a downward spiral with several losses following those upsets.

In my opinion, the Syracuse job Dino was handed probably bordered on the edge of a complete rebuild, much like when Marrone inherited Syracuse from Greg Robinson. That’s not to say they are similar rebuilds, but rebuilds nonetheless.

Dino has certainly inherited better facilities, but he is also stuck in one of the two most difficult conference divisions in all of the p5 world. Our division has produced 2 out of the last 3 national champions, and this season alone each and every one of our divisional foes are bowl eligible with a combined record of 44-25.

That aside, rebuilds don’t just happen randomly. There are three things that must happen: better talent, better coaching acumen, and commitment from the school. Coach Mac’s rebuild coincided with the commitment to the Dome, exciting style of play, and several talented coaches that made their way through Syracuse. This first part is going to take a look at what I believe could be the most important phase of the rebuild, and that’s improving the talent base.

As I mentioned above, I believe our division is every bit as difficult as the SEC West. Clemson, FSU, and Louisville can match Alabama, Auburn, and Miss St on a talent level on an annual basis. Our roster as currently constructed is a sub .500 football team. Perhaps if we were in the ACC Coastal would I consider us a .500 team talent wise, but we don’t have that luxury.

How did we get here? I think there were several factors that contributed to poor recruiting over Shafer’s three seasons. The first was taking too many risks on potential non-qualifiers or troublesome kids, the second being the physical profile of our recruits, and the third factor would be a lack of offensive identity during his tenure.

Shafer’s willingness to “wait out” a recruits academics stuffed our classes with kids that never stepped foot on campus or were gone rather quickly. The 2013 class was under difficult circumstances, yet we signed several kids that really never made an impact here. Corey Cooper never made it here and Wayne Williams was gone quickly. In 2014 Cooper (again), KJ Williams, Eduardo, Prater, and Dawson (health circumstances) never stepped foot on campus. Another “borderline” kid, Naes Howard, literally tried to murder two of his teammates. 2015 was a bit better, on Blair failed to qualify. That being said, Amir Early was a borderline kid coming out of school and is now a registered sex offender.

That is 10 kids (half a class) lost to circumstances we could have controlled to an extent. We aren’t a selector school that can afford to miss out on 6-7 kids a class, because they know that the 4 or 5 star kids in next year’s class have pretty great potential to become excellent players.

The second factor, the physical profile of our recruits is arguably the biggest downfall to Shafer’s recruiting. Advanced analytics tend to look at outliers like weight adjusted 40 time, height/weight ratio of skill players, etc. I would wager Shafer’s classes would really struggle to hold up against those metrics.

In my opinion, we had 2 outlier players (small but dynamic against p5 competition) out of 70 some odd recruits signed: Cordy and Estime. I think Bennett and Franklin are borderline size for their position, but passable. For every Cordy we have a AJ Long, Carl Jones, or Cordell Hudson. For every Bennett we have an Arlyk Perry and Colton Moskol.

NC St does not have players our size running around out there. Boston College does not have players our size running around out there. These are peer programs. Today’s game against BC only reinforced that thought. They have a 6’5” 280 pound impact DE making plays out there. We are the smallest team in our division. Unless all our are players are markedly faster (they aren’t) than the other team, advanced scouting tells us our players should be inferior.

Finally, the lack of offensive identity under Shafer really has placed a ceiling on this offense. We have several slot / wing types (Strick, Neal, Perkins) but no really true RB. Our QBs were recruited for a different system, and we really didn’t have a true thrower until Devito came a long. We have some receivers like Curtis and Enoicy, and then kids like Avant. These are positionless players in Baber.s offense which is built upon power running and vertical threats.

Bottom line: 32 players that Shafer signed that could have still had their eligibility are not on this roster for one reason or another - and they weren’t run off.

So I guess the final question is what is the staff trying to do to adjust this? They are definitely believers in getting bigger in the trenches, as our OL recruiting can attest. The have a weight /speed metric for skill players (no more small slow players). Our younger kids on defense have been recruited with length in mind (no defensive backs under 6’, lbs shorter than 6’1”),

Obviously they need to hit on names, as advanced scouting metrics can only get you so far. I don’t see a “video game” player on this roster right now. Video game players are players that can make something happen on sheer talent alone ala ~McNabb, Freeney, Bullock, etc. Dungey is certainly a player that gives opposing coaches fits at times, but I’m not sure if opposing DCs struggle to sleep at night because of him.

Those are players we must get in order to ove onward and upwards. We faced two players in the last two weeks that fit the “video game” mold: Jackson and AJ Dillon. You can see the stress they place upon the opposing team as the run around ore through our kids.
 
Last edited:
Fantastic.

Hoping Alton Robinson can become that videogame player
 
I've read that Dino's recruits are better; are they?

Another football season has passed, and we are going without another bowl game. This marks the fourth consecutive Syracuse season without a bowl, and 7th out of our last 10. These last few season have appeared to be even more taxing on the Syracuse fan, as we have seemingly “turned the corner” with upset wins, only to be led into a downward spiral with several losses following those upsets.

In my opinion, the Syracuse job Dino was handed probably bordered on the edge of a complete rebuild, much like when Marrone inherited Syracuse from Greg Robinson. That’s not to say they are similar rebuilds, but rebuilds nonetheless.

Dino has certainly inherited better facilities, but he is also stuck in one of the two most difficult conference divisions in all of the p5 world. Our division has produced 2 out of the last 3 national champions, and this season alone each and every one of our divisional foes are bowl eligible with a combined record of 44-25.

That aside, rebuilds don’t just happen randomly. There are three things that must happen: better talent, better coaching acumen, and commitment from the school. Coach Mac’s rebuild coincided with the commitment to the Dome, exciting style of play, and several talented coaches that made their way through Syracuse. This first part is going to take a look at what I believe could be the most important phase of the rebuild, and that’s improving the talent base.

As I mentioned above, I believe our division is every bit as difficult as the SEC West. Clemson, FSU, and Louisville can match Alabama, Auburn, and Miss St on a talent level on an annual basis. Our roster as currently constructed is a sub .500 football team. Perhaps if we were in the ACC Coastal would I consider us a .500 team talent wise, but we don’t have that luxury.

How did we get here? I think there were several factors that contributed to poor recruiting over Shafer’s three seasons. The first was taking too many risks on potential non-qualifiers or troublesome kids, the second being the physical profile of our recruits, and the third factor would be a lack of offensive identity during his tenure.

Shafer’s willingness to “wait out” a recruits academics stuffed our classes with kids that never stepped foot on campus or were gone rather quickly. The 2013 class was under difficult circumstances, yet we signed several kids that really never made an impact here. Corey Cooper never made it here and Wayne Williams was gone quickly. In 2014 Cooper (again), KJ Williams, Eduardo, Prater, and Dawson (health circumstances) never stepped foot on campus. Another “borderline” kid, Naes Howard, literally tried to murder two of his teammates. 2015 was a bit better, on Blair failed to qualify. That being said, Amir Early was a borderline kid coming out of school and is now a registered s e x offender.

That is 10 kids (half a class) lost to circumstances we could have controlled to an extent. We aren’t a selector school that can afford to miss out on 6-7 kids a class, because they know that the 4 or 5 star kids in next year’s class have pretty great potential to become excellent players.

The second factor, the physical profile of our recruits is arguably the biggest downfall to Shafer’s recruiting. Advanced analytics tend to look at outliers like weight adjusted 40 time, height/weight ratio of skill players, etc. I would wager Shafer’s classes would really struggle to hold up against those metrics.

In my opinion, we had 2 outlier players (small but dynamic against p5 competition) out of 70 some odd recruits signed: Cordy and Estime. I think Bennett and Franklin are borderline size for their position, but passable. For every Cordy we have a AJ Long, Carl Jones, or Cordell Hudson. For every Bennett we have an Arlyk Perry and Colton Moskol.

NC St does not have players our size running around out there. Boston College does not have players our size running around out there. These are peer programs. Today’s game against BC only reinforced that thought. They have a 6’5” 280 pound impact DE making plays out there. We are the smallest team in our division. Unless all our are players are markedly faster (they aren’t) than the other team, advanced scouting tells us our players should be inferior.

Finally, the lack of offensive identity under Shafer really has placed a ceiling on this offense. We have several slot / wing types (Strick, Neal, Perkins) but no really true RB. Our QBs were recruited for a different system, and we really didn’t have a true thrower until Devito came a long. We have some receivers like Curtis and Enoicy, and then kids like Avant. These are positionless players in Baber.s offense which is built upon power running and vertical threats.

So I guess the final question is what is the staff trying to do to adjust this? They are definitely believers in getting bigger in the trenches, as our OL recruiting can attest. The have a weight /speed metric for skill players (no more small slow players). Our younger kids on defense have been recruited with length in mind (no defensive backs under 6’, lbs shorter than 6’1”),

Obviously they need to hit on names, as advanced scouting metrics can only get you so far. I don’t see a “video game” player on this roster right now. Video game players are players that can make something happen on sheer talent alone ala ~McNabb, Freeney, Bullock, etc. Dungey is certainly a player that gives opposing coaches fits at times, but I’m not sure if opposing DCs struggle to sleep at night because of him.

Those are players we must get in order to ove onward and upwards. We faced two players in the last two weeks that fit the “video game” mold: Jackson and AJ Dillon. You can see the stress they place upon the opposing team as the run around ore through our kids.
 
Another football season has passed, and we are going without another bowl game. This marks the fourth consecutive Syracuse season without a bowl, and 7th out of our last 10. These last few season have appeared to be even more taxing on the Syracuse fan, as we have seemingly “turned the corner” with upset wins, only to be led into a downward spiral with several losses following those upsets.

In my opinion, the Syracuse job Dino was handed probably bordered on the edge of a complete rebuild, much like when Marrone inherited Syracuse from Greg Robinson. That’s not to say they are similar rebuilds, but rebuilds nonetheless.

Dino has certainly inherited better facilities, but he is also stuck in one of the two most difficult conference divisions in all of the p5 world. Our division has produced 2 out of the last 3 national champions, and this season alone each and every one of our divisional foes are bowl eligible with a combined record of 44-25.

That aside, rebuilds don’t just happen randomly. There are three things that must happen: better talent, better coaching acumen, and commitment from the school. Coach Mac’s rebuild coincided with the commitment to the Dome, exciting style of play, and several talented coaches that made their way through Syracuse. This first part is going to take a look at what I believe could be the most important phase of the rebuild, and that’s improving the talent base.

As I mentioned above, I believe our division is every bit as difficult as the SEC West. Clemson, FSU, and Louisville can match Alabama, Auburn, and Miss St on a talent level on an annual basis. Our roster as currently constructed is a sub .500 football team. Perhaps if we were in the ACC Coastal would I consider us a .500 team talent wise, but we don’t have that luxury.

How did we get here? I think there were several factors that contributed to poor recruiting over Shafer’s three seasons. The first was taking too many risks on potential non-qualifiers or troublesome kids, the second being the physical profile of our recruits, and the third factor would be a lack of offensive identity during his tenure.

Shafer’s willingness to “wait out” a recruits academics stuffed our classes with kids that never stepped foot on campus or were gone rather quickly. The 2013 class was under difficult circumstances, yet we signed several kids that really never made an impact here. Corey Cooper never made it here and Wayne Williams was gone quickly. In 2014 Cooper (again), KJ Williams, Eduardo, Prater, and Dawson (health circumstances) never stepped foot on campus. Another “borderline” kid, Naes Howard, literally tried to murder two of his teammates. 2015 was a bit better, on Blair failed to qualify. That being said, Amir Early was a borderline kid coming out of school and is now a registered s e x offender.

That is 10 kids (half a class) lost to circumstances we could have controlled to an extent. We aren’t a selector school that can afford to miss out on 6-7 kids a class, because they know that the 4 or 5 star kids in next year’s class have pretty great potential to become excellent players.

The second factor, the physical profile of our recruits is arguably the biggest downfall to Shafer’s recruiting. Advanced analytics tend to look at outliers like weight adjusted 40 time, height/weight ratio of skill players, etc. I would wager Shafer’s classes would really struggle to hold up against those metrics.

In my opinion, we had 2 outlier players (small but dynamic against p5 competition) out of 70 some odd recruits signed: Cordy and Estime. I think Bennett and Franklin are borderline size for their position, but passable. For every Cordy we have a AJ Long, Carl Jones, or Cordell Hudson. For every Bennett we have an Arlyk Perry and Colton Moskol.

NC St does not have players our size running around out there. Boston College does not have players our size running around out there. These are peer programs. Today’s game against BC only reinforced that thought. They have a 6’5” 280 pound impact DE making plays out there. We are the smallest team in our division. Unless all our are players are markedly faster (they aren’t) than the other team, advanced scouting tells us our players should be inferior.

Finally, the lack of offensive identity under Shafer really has placed a ceiling on this offense. We have several slot / wing types (Strick, Neal, Perkins) but no really true RB. Our QBs were recruited for a different system, and we really didn’t have a true thrower until Devito came a long. We have some receivers like Curtis and Enoicy, and then kids like Avant. These are positionless players in Baber.s offense which is built upon power running and vertical threats.

Bottom line: 32 players that Shafer signed that could have still had their eligibility are not on this roster for one reason or another - and they weren’t run off.

So I guess the final question is what is the staff trying to do to adjust this? They are definitely believers in getting bigger in the trenches, as our OL recruiting can attest. The have a weight /speed metric for skill players (no more small slow players). Our younger kids on defense have been recruited with length in mind (no defensive backs under 6’, lbs shorter than 6’1”),

Obviously they need to hit on names, as advanced scouting metrics can only get you so far. I don’t see a “video game” player on this roster right now. Video game players are players that can make something happen on sheer talent alone ala ~McNabb, Freeney, Bullock, etc. Dungey is certainly a player that gives opposing coaches fits at times, but I’m not sure if opposing DCs struggle to sleep at night because of him.

Those are players we must get in order to ove onward and upwards. We faced two players in the last two weeks that fit the “video game” mold: Jackson and AJ Dillon. You can see the stress they place upon the opposing team as the run around ore through our kids.

All the doomsday preppers need to read this first before posting
 
BC today is an outlier, thet will always give "speed" teams trouble road grating them, just like they did FSU and the Ville. Think about the talent argument there.

As far as commitment from the school? What are you looking for? First class planes with 22 yo asian massages? We have all we need to practice, prepare, and succeed.

As far as the Dline. That Dline hit with, and played with the best in the conference. Again, fellas, once something like Clemson and FSU and UM happen...that debunks the talent thing. Slayton and our tackles can play with anyone and they do, and 6'4",250# DEs are the going rate and ours did well against top talent. Thing is the T2 puts such a premium on front 4 pressure, its a pro defense. Our front 4 did well this year w/o much back end support.
 
Part of me hates these threads because they aren't fair. SS's recruits don't get any love, but they honestly aren't bad at all. We're about 3 players away from having a really great team. Give me one more true receiving threat, a legit good power runner, a strong DE, and possibly a strong safety and tell me that we don't get at least one more score against LSU, Miami, FSU, and NCSU.

The other part of me generally agrees that Dino has it in him to get that extra playmaker each year (or at least most years), which, over a 5 year span, should account for 3 finished playmakers (i.e. Etta-level) on each team.

That handful of players plus players recruited for a specific system will be a difference-maker. I think that we'll see the right pieces next year. I'm not certain that it will materialize (although, it very well might). However, it will definitely materialize by the year after next (at the latest).
 
Part of me hates these threads because they aren't fair. SS's recruits don't get any love, but they honestly aren't bad at all. We're about 3 players away from having a really great team. Give me one more true receiving threat, a legit good power runner, a strong DE, and possibly a strong safety and tell me that we don't get at least one more score against LSU, Miami, FSU, and NCSU.

The other part of me generally agrees that Dino has it in him to get that extra playmaker each year (or at least most years), which, over a 5 year span, should account for 3 finished playmakers (i.e. Etta-level) on each team.

That handful of players plus players recruited for a specific system will be a difference-maker. I think that we'll see the right pieces next year. I'm not certain that it will materialize (although, it very well might). However, it will definitely materialize by the year after next (at the latest).

They are certainly some very good SS players - but you are overlooking the fact that 32 of his signees that should still be eligible aren’t on this roster. That’s a recruitng class and a half out of his three gone. Major issue.
 
Dino has certainly inherited better facilities, but he is also stuck in one of the two most difficult conference divisions in all of the p5 world. Our division has produced 2 out of the last 3 national champions, and this season alone each and every one of our divisional foes are bowl eligible with a combined record of 44-25.

As I mentioned above, I believe our division is every bit as difficult as the SEC West. Clemson, FSU, and Louisville can match Alabama, Auburn, and Miss St on a talent level on an annual basis. Our roster as currently constructed is a sub .500 football team. Perhaps if we were in the ACC Coastal would I consider us a .500 team talent wise, but we don’t have that luxury.
This crap really pisses me off. There's no reason the ACC can't rotate teams in each division at least once every two years. The only purpose of the divisions are to determine a championship game. You could have different teams in each division every year. Why not make it interesting? Why do I have to see Syracuse play Wake Forest and Florida State every year, but only see Miami and Virginia Tech once a decade? Not to mention the ridiculously unfair balance between the divisions. It's garbage.

Am I wrong in thinking that changes to the divisions would make for a much more fair and fun experience for everyone involved?
 
One of the things I recall about the Robinson era was the size of the players. It was like they got smaller and smaller and smaller each year - particularly at wide receiver. And then it never really got better after that. I would love to know why, if I can tell that why can't someone who actually knows football as a profession do something about it? It must be difficult, right?

I recently watched Syracuse games from the 90s on YouTube and those players were bigger all around than what we have today. There were exceptions for height at running back but those guys had enough meat on their bones to take a hit. It was like we could recruit for size and then it was completely ignored.
 
This crap really pisses me off. There's no reason the ACC can't rotate teams in each division at least once every two years. The only purpose of the divisions are to determine a championship game. You could have different teams in each division every year. Why not make it interesting? Why do I have to see Syracuse play Wake Forest and Florida State every year, but only see Miami and Virginia Tech once a decade? Not to mention the ridiculously unfair balance between the divisions. It's garbage.

Am I wrong in thinking that changes to the divisions would make for a much more fair and fun experience for everyone involved?

Your lips to god’s ears. We have to overcome Clemson and FSU every single year. Reality is Ville is probably just as good as Miami, Miami just plays in the other side of the conference.

I guarantee Miami has 3 losses if they played in our division, if not 4.
 
One of the things I recall about the Robinson era was the size of the players. It was like they got smaller and smaller and smaller each year - particularly at wide receiver. And then it never really got better after that. I would love to know why, if I can tell that why can't someone who actually knows football as a profession do something about it? It must be difficult, right?

I recently watched Syracuse games from the 90s on YouTube and those players were bigger all around than what we have today. There were exceptions for height at running back but those guys had enough meat on their bones to take a hit. It was like we could recruit for size and then it was completely ignored.

We were also a top 20 program during that era, and went to multiple BCS level bowls. Today we had Carl “don’t call me Tebucky” Jones trying to come downhill on a 240 pound back. Didn’t end well.
 
We were also a top 20 program during that era, and went to multiple BCS level bowls. Today we had Carl “don’t call me Tebucky” Jones trying to come downhill on a 240 pound back. Didn’t end well.
Pretty sure the current staff brought in Carl Jones.
 
Time will tell. It’s still waaaaaay to early. Most kids aren’t ready to contribute until either year 2 or 3. In theory they are better fits for his respective systems.

It helps that there's a clear cut system. 2 different OCs in Shafers 2nd and 3rd seasons.

I think of Babers recruiting as I think of Boeheim's -- You get the best guys you can but you absolutely look for certain pieces to fit your system. (I obviously know JB is a HOF coach, just an observation)
 
This crap really pisses me off. There's no reason the ACC can't rotate teams in each division at least once every two years. The only purpose of the divisions are to determine a championship game. You could have different teams in each division every year. Why not make it interesting? Why do I have to see Syracuse play Wake Forest and Florida State every year, but only see Miami and Virginia Tech once a decade? Not to mention the ridiculously unfair balance between the divisions. It's garbage.

Am I wrong in thinking that changes to the divisions would make for a much more fair and fun experience for everyone involved?

I'd be angry if I was Clemson, FSU, or L'ville than a team like Cuse/Wake/BC... L'ville would kill to be in the coastal. Same for FSU. We could have gone from 4-8 to maybe 6-6 whereas L'ville could have been the coastal champs (maybe not this year with Miami) ... the divisions stink. No reason for us not play more of the teams in our own damn conference.
 
And all those times I got told the staff knew what they were doing when I’d b!tch about Shafers recruiting. It was almost like they were trying to recruit the smallest defenders to prove a point. Shafer turned out to be a far worse recruiter than Marrone. At least Marrone had a plan and metrics he followed. Scott only set the program back half a decade.
 
Shafer never had a chance to recruit. His first class was trying to shore up what was left and available with Marrone's departure. His second class was his only real complete class and they were very good. By his third class, he was already being targeted for firing.
 
Shafer never had a chance to recruit. His first class was trying to shore up what was left and available with Marrone's departure. His second class was his only real complete class and they were very good. By his third class, he was already being targeted for firing.

#1 Half those recruits were on defense so there should have been no issues.

#2 What does it say when Babers only decided 3-4 of Shafer’s 3rd recruiting class were worth keeping. (Most of those recruits not kept by Babers ended up at G5 or FCS schools)
 
I recall reading an article on Wake Forest and how through similar issues as SU they had lost and needed to replace an entire recruiting class. How it would take several years to rebuild depth. Seems in year three Clawson was able to do that. I would search for the article but my modem died last night. I'm blaming y'all.
 
#1 Half those recruits were on defense so there should have been no issues.

#2 What does it say when Babers only decided 3-4 of Shafer’s 3rd recruiting class were worth keeping. (Most of those recruits not kept by Babers ended up at G5 or FCS schools)
It must have been difficult to convince good recruits to come when termination was hanging over his head.
 
Every head coach we have had knows ideal metrics for positions - height, weight, speed. Every one of them has scouted, made offers, and recruited bigger faster kids. They did not land the ones they wanted, and usually did not get visits.

Coach Mac was a charmer - able to sell himself and the program. Dino has similar traits.

Then, it is a question of what the HC does when he can't land the ones with the high metrics. Marrone went juco to fill gaps in his lines. Shafer's took risks on academics and took small players or thin players - not by choice. Babers went heavy into juco ranks and grad transfers in the 2017 cycle - and maybe this time as well.

It is early to judge Babers 's recruiting. His classes seem deeper, with fewer whiffs. His jucos and grad transfers have contributed as expected and Etta Tawo was sterling. Not enough impact yet among the first and second years other than the DEs, Williams, Severais and Heckel. Need to see a skill position player or two emerge.

And then how does Babers close this cycle?
 
He better close it out with some game ready adults at DB, Safety,DT, WR,LB.
 
All these issues and still really a play or 2 away from getting to 6 and the bowl game.. a couple kicks against FSU, a couple snaps against Miami, a dropped punt vs MTSU. Things that were not really talent related.

its not a huge leap forward we have to take. Wake scored a ton, but we did too.
 
All these issues and still really a play or 2 away from getting to 6 and the bowl game.. a couple kicks against FSU, a couple snaps against Miami, a dropped punt vs MTSU. Things that were not really talent related.

its not a huge leap forward we have to take. Wake scored a ton, but we did too.

So, this is true to a point, but any losing team can always play that what if game. The problem is we got to 4 wins, then collapsed -- and it was ugly, particularly against teams we feel should be peers and wins in the Dome (Wake & BC). And when you close out 0 for November, it is hard to look back at MTSU and find solace.

Love Babers, though, saying 2018 season will be remembered for a long time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
172,201
Messages
5,003,373
Members
6,023
Latest member
Cuselax2215

Online statistics

Members online
177
Guests online
1,921
Total visitors
2,098


...
Top Bottom