Me too, but of course the ACC will be the last conference to do this. Phillips is just horrible as a commissionerWho cares, NASCAR does it and makes a ton of money off of it
If this gets more $$$$ into the schools hands I’m all for it
I think the fear is that it's not like NASCAR with sponsors buying in on these conferences to just slap their name on it, but some uber-rich Hedge Fund guy buying to stroke his own ego and just so he can say it's part of his "portfolio." But the minute the wind changes, and he loses a nickel, he pulls the plug and tears the conference apart, as these Hedge Fund guys are kind of fickle.Who cares, NASCAR does it and makes a ton of money off of it
If this gets more $$$$ into the schools hands I’m all for it
Please help me understand who these people are that would be getting into the mix, what they hope to achieve, and what influence they would have on the operation of the conferences & teams considering it.I really hope the ACC isn't asleep at the wheel and is talking about something like this and it hasn't been leaked yet.
We can all debate how much private equity coming into college sports stinks, and its not right and it's gonna be evil. That's fine, but its also the new reality we are living in and I hope the ACC is ahead of this curve not behind it
Ego, brother ego. When you are a multi-billionaire, it is all about egoPlease help me understand who these people are that would be getting into the mix, what they hope to achieve, and what influence they would have on the operation of the conferences & teams considering it.
I am at a loss for why anyone would sink $1bn (from the link above) to get into college sports (football) for one conference. What is the play? This makes no sense to me.
The BAC as presented by Budweiser.I can see a consortium buying the B12 and ACC up in tranches and merging to a super league.
Please help me understand who these people are that would be getting into the mix, what they hope to achieve, and what influence they would have on the operation of the conferences & teams considering it.
I am at a loss for why anyone would sink $1bn (from the link above) to get into college sports (football) for one conference. What is the play? This makes no sense to me.
Popeye's - the new PACC 17carolina ford dealers and Mellow Mushroom
I'm a Pepsi guy myself. Pepsi Max 12 Conference.
Bojangles! Has to be.Food Lion is on the clock!
Screw that. FSU doesn't deserve more than their other members. Just because they can complain.Maybe unequal revenue naming rights could be a plan for the ACC. FSU and Clemson with a good majority and split the rest. FSU and Clemson would be much closer to the Big 10 and SEC considering the success based initiatives.
I really don't understand the investment side of this either...It makes sense to invest in the B18 or SEC, but the potential benefit seems small for the other conferences. And what is in it for the schools in the other conferences? Sure having money now is better than later, but after 5 years you are worse off for as long as the conference exists. Short term thinking.
Another point, the conferences are non profit. How can they keep that status if they have investors taking an equity position looking for a profit? This seems like a major question mark for both the conferences and the investors.
The high number I've seen for this for the Big 12 is 50 million dollars per year. For a 16 member league, that is only 3 million per school per year with 2 million left for the league office. That aint much. What do you give away for that pittance?I really hope the ACC isn't asleep at the wheel and is talking about something like this and it hasn't been leaked yet.
We can all debate how much private equity coming into college sports stinks, and its not right and it's gonna be evil. That's fine, but its also the new reality we are living in and I hope the ACC is ahead of this curve not behind it
It’s bo timeFood Lion is on the clock!
They receive 20% of the revenue? 20% off the top for the life of the conference. So at 500m they get 100m a year. 10 year return of principal if annual revenue is flat.how does the firm make money off this deal? Oh I know throw teams out they don't think are performing well.
They receive 20% of the revenue? 20% off the top for the life of the conference. So at 500m they get 100m a year. 10 year return of principal if annual revenue is flat.
Maybe it's a 20 year deal. No idea but it's basically a way to front load an increase and hope that future increases in revenue cover it down the road.