Holy Smokes! What game were you watching??? Other than Dungey,the OL was the story of the game. Totally dominated the LOS. Dude, I think you accidentally threw in an old GRob vhs.
What are they waiting for
He is but he has a hard time getting off blocks. Don’t know what our guys teach but Dan Conley always told me that some coaches teach dip and rip so they get by the big uglies without making contact. Guthrie is more natural at it cause he has always played lb. a couple times I saw whit square up with ol and he didn’t do well. Great motor and flies to the ball though so I think we got 2 good ones and Armstrong played tough too. I was nervous of him only because he seemed to be a catcher and not a downhill type. Consider me relieved. He came downhill hard and has speed too.
But isn’t Cisco supposed to be deeper than there deepest player anyways. Don’t get me wrong, their receivers have serious speed but if u know that flip the hips and go and neither Bradshaw or Cisco did that and a few times even Cordy.
I look forward to Johnson, as rough as this is to say, because he's not Riley. Riley just looks so limited and small out there.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
You thought they dominated the LOS? If that were the case I think we would have seen more gaping holes and RBs not getting touched until they were 5 yards past the LOS. I didn't see that. I watched other games this weekend where that was the case. I'd say they looked solid, but they were far from dominant.
First game, this should improve, but the line did pretty well for this game. They pretty much dominated that D line.
We did see gaping holes. Go back and watch all the run plays in the 1st half. There was wide open space EVERYWHERE. The RB’s found some of them and did t see others. I looked at the entirety of the run game today and in the first half SU was manhandling them at the LOS. 2nd half was a different story, but then again WMU was attacking Devito the whole 3rd quarter. In the 4th, the runs were designed to chew clock.
I remember one to Custis, but that's all I can think of.
If that's the case, our RBs are worse than I thought. Gaping holes should lead to a much better average than our RBs had. I'll have to take your word for it, I guess.
Yup, now that you mentioned it. I do remember that one.
Strick has no vision. He has missed more holes than Coon dog
Strick has no vision. He has missed more holes than Coon dog
Watch the replays. Vision is not his gift as an RB. After you watch Strick watch Eric who has great vision. If you want a good example of Stricks lack of Vision dial up his touch down last year against Clemson. Great catch and great balance. Now follow the run to the end zone. So tell me Bees do you think one of Stricks strengths as a RB is his vision? If so please point out a couple of runs that prove your point.
