T
tee1222
Guest
He said Eeeeenis in his presser at least twice. Learn the name by now, Jamie. Or is he showing his true feelings?Dixon is such a dick... a small dick
Sorry, Jamie, can't hide your Eenis Envy I guess.
He said Eeeeenis in his presser at least twice. Learn the name by now, Jamie. Or is he showing his true feelings?Dixon is such a dick... a small dick
Don't you mean on the court?I love seeing the grin wiped off of Jamie Dixon's face. All game he sits on the sideline with the Joker-like smile and it pisses me off!!
Agreed. BIG difference between 'should have' and 'did'.What bugs me the most about this whole Pitt thing is this false narrative I keep hearing from the ESPN crowd that Pitt should've won both games. I heard Vitale mention that during the Duke game and it keeps coming up over and over again.
Syracuse led the first game at the half 25-21. Pitt's last first half lead was 12-10 at the 11:44 mark.
Syracuse extended the lead to 10 37-27 at the 14:40 mark of the second half and still held a two point lead at the 6:30 mark.
Pitt's biggest second half lead was 52-49 at the 2:30 mark. Has a three point lead suddenly become insurmountable with two and a half minutes still left to play? Is that why Pitt "should've won" this game?
Fact is, Syracuse took the lead back 53-52 with nearly two minutes left (1:50) and never trailed again.
It wasn't like Ennis had to make 35 footers here either, he broke down the Pitt defense off the dribble and converted a couple of high percentage shots down the stretch. That was skill, not mere luck.
Quite frankly, if Syracuse had lost the first game I would've felt like they were the team that let one get away. They outplayed Pitt for the majority of the first game and won for that reason. The second game they kept it close and gave themselves a chance to pull it out, which they did this time in a rather hostile environment.
Syracuse is the better team 2 - 0 says it all.
What bugs me the most about this whole Pitt thing is this false narrative I keep hearing from the ESPN crowd that Pitt should've won both games. I heard Vitale mention that during the Duke game and it keeps coming up over and over again.
you would think reading smarmy once would suffice but here i am wanting to read it again. i've spent my entire life calling people names and i've never approached anything as good as thathe's a smarmy .
No, I don't think so.Great coach
I think it's getting even faster. Dickwad.
Dixon definitely not a great coach. Can't win big games - a consistent under-performer in the Big Dance.No, I don't think so.
(and I probably could be convinced Calhoun was a great coach)