GoSU96
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 21,654
- Like
- 42,241
Yeah, but to be fair, that was negativity after a loss, not a win. A loss which was an offensive failure across the board, worse than we've had in this regime. So bringing it back to a major rebuild or the previous regime after that particular loss seemed like an argument for convenience. Especially when the trends, while up, aren't exactly that far up.
It's not that crazy to look at the situation and say if we're admitting we'll have execution inconsistencies because of rebuilding an offense, then why not rebuild it with the new guys you are bringing in, instead of so many holdovers who were freshmen during the final year of the dark ages.
I think the offense will be fine when one of the athletic QBs is deemed ready to take over, or we have no choice but to use them.
So many hold overs? It's 4 starters and two rotation guys. The TE is on pace to set season records at his position. The QB could still end up with season records at his position. The TB could have a 1000k yards. Why should they sit?