Cuse69
Starter
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2018
- Messages
- 1,118
- Like
- 1,152
They certainly aren't in disarray but they aren't any power house either. Wake has one Q1 win and that is a road victory over 12-10 VA TECH.Wake Forest now there's a team in disarray
They certainly aren't in disarray but they aren't any power house either. Wake has one Q1 win and that is a road victory over 12-10 VA TECH.Wake Forest now there's a team in disarray
And we’re not going to hit shots at the clip we did today 3 or 4 games in a row but that’s how we have to play if we want to go on a run in the ACCT. We can get consistent open looks against any team not named Dook moving the ball as we did today.We had several Possesions today where we barely dribbled.
Best offensive team since 2012. If we just could have been mediocre on defense we would have 17 or 18 wins.It actually is. 12th in AdjOff on KenPom. It's the 236th on D that has been our real issue all year.
I said at halftime even though we were shooting about 55% that we were leaving a lot of meat on the bone.As good as their efficiency is it is still mind blowing to see some of the middle school level turnovers that occur due to lack of attention, lazy passes, dribbling off feet, etc.
Ok and we crushed themThey certainly aren't in disarray but they aren't any power house either. Wake has one Q1 win and that is a road victory over 12-10 VA TECH.
Yes, I care how points are scored. I don't think numbers tell the whole story. The capability of a team to score in a variety of ways ensures that they can score against any defense which I think is the best definition of elite.folks around here get hung up on how the points are scored, I'm merely pointing out that when yr efficiency ranking is in the top 20 of 350+ teams this far into the season, it's an elite offense
Haters mad
Not for nothing, and certainly not just directed towards you @jdubs, but I seriously doubt that we have "haters" here. I think all of us want the same things, SU victories. How we express our perspectives whether positive or negative, should not determine the label that's placed on us.Haters mad
It’s amazing how people here continue to harp on the offense. We did have a couple of terrible, inexplicably bad offensive games against Duke and Pitt, but mostly we’ve been good to great. The numbers bear it out. And yes, a true penetrating PG who can get into the lane and find the open man or score would be hugely helpful.folks around here get hung up on how the points are scored, I'm merely pointing out that when yr efficiency ranking is in the top 20 of 350+ teams this far into the season, it's an elite offense
Who said that?Wins against two teams in disarray and all of a sudden this team is headed to the F4 lololololol
it’s been 23 games now. It ain’t happening. Call me a hater or whatever, but against better teams, we have to hope they miss open shots and we get rebounds.If they can start to improve there, the defense could be serviceable.
They also were vs. Duke and UNC. They went toe-to-toe against the Dukies, and got jobbed in the UNC game.The Cards were without their starting big man today…..
I thought the defense looked good today or was it just Louisville couldn't shoot.It’s amazing how people here continue to harp on the offense. We did have a couple of terrible, inexplicably bad offensive games against Duke and Pitt, but mostly we’ve been good to great. The numbers bear it out. And yes, a true penetrating PG who can get into the lane and find the open man or score would be hugely helpful.
But nobody wants to talk about the defense because they think with our athleticism and speed deficit, we’ll never get better. But I don’t agree. These guys, especially Jimmy, have been terrible in the rotations and being out of position and then the zone collapses and no one fans out to shooters. If they can start to improve there, the defense could be serviceable.
As much as some may laugh, making the tourney is all but out of the picture, if somehow this team did make it, that would mean they went on a serious roll. And no one wants to play a team with 4 guys who can shoot out of the starting 5 when they're on a roll.I can tell you this, if this team makes the field, no top seeds want to see them in their bracket.
Joe is seeing the floor better than any guard we’ve had since Ennis. He’s picking the defense apart on pick and rolls and he found Jessie rolling from the wing when two players went to guard Buddy. He has a couple of really good reads on defense that led to steals. His game continues to evolve. He was never a point guard until he came to SU. Jessie is the most improved and Joe is #2.I luv Joe but he's not a point guard in my estimation. Every time he starts dribbling I hold my breath. Also. the team has the overall speed of the Mills Brothers.
They would pay if teams put their sf on Buddy. Swider is the key. I want to see him in the paint. 3's come and go.As one of the announcers - can't remember who, said in a previous game, Swider is the key, along with Jesse of course. If Swider is hitting shots, the D will pay if they're throwing double teams at Buddy and Joe.
I luv Joe but he's not a point guard in my estimation. Every time he starts dribbling I hold my breath. Also. the team has the overall speed of the Mills Brothers.
You will have to look at other teams resumes on the bubble, they aren't going to be all that strong either. Cuse just has to keep rolling and let the chips fall where they may and IMO they have a very realistic shot.As much as some may laugh, making the tourney is all but out of the picture, if somehow this team did make it, that would mean they went on a serious roll. And no one wants to play a team with 4 guys who can shoot out of the starting 5 when they're on a roll.