Shawn91111
Starter
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 1,685
- Like
- 1,910
He was much better actually and he was like MJ in his senior year. A very dominant player. Owens was never dominat
Did you ever watch Billy Owens in college, like once?
He was much better actually and he was like MJ in his senior year. A very dominant player. Owens was never dominat
Arguing Wallace vs. Owens is like arguing McNamara vs. Matt Roe.
One guy put up unbelievable numbers and was very talented.
The other guy had balls and delivered in the clutch. They became the legends.
Probably every game he played. Wallace was a lot better. His senior season is without doubt the best season any SU player has had in the past 40 years with possible exception of AnthonyDid you ever watch Billy Owens in college, like once?
Owens was never dominat
Probably every game he played. Wallace was a lot better. His senior season is without doubt the best season any SU player has had in the past 40 years with possible exception of Anthony
Arguing Wallace vs. Owens is like arguing McNamara vs. Matt Roe.
One guy put up unbelievable numbers and was very talented.
The other guy had balls and delivered in the clutch. They became the legends.
Dude, Owens averaged 23 and 12 his junior year. Those are insane numbers. What the heck are you talking about?
Wallace had similar numbers and took his team to the NC game. Billy was highly skilled but he just didn't take over games like Wallace did. Wallace was so clutchDude, Owens averaged 23 and 12 his junior year. Those are insane numbers. What the heck are you talking about?
Wallace had similar numbers and took his team to the NC game. Billy was highly skilled but he just didn't take over games like Wallace did. Wallace was so clutch
Wallace had similar numbers and took his team to the NC game. Billy was highly skilled but he just didn't take over games like Wallace did. Wallace was so clutch
I have no problem with the list other than #12, so it's not worth knocking the last sport, for me anyhow. Give the OP some likes, as he did save use from having to go through one of those annoying slideshows, seriously.
So many good/great players have worn the Orange. If we want to think of a guy who lived in the shadows of other greats, Stevie Thompson comes to mind. Check this out: "He played phenomenally well in the NCAA tournament, hitting 68% of this field goal attempts in the fifteen tournament games he played". He left as the 4th highest scorer in team history. Again folks, so many good players to choose from.
Billy was very good He is top 5 for sureWallace was clutch and had that incredible confidence in himself and his team, for sure.
I don't see how you can average 23 and 12 and NOT take over games. Billy took over and dominated many games.
He was a great player, but did not come up clutch in the big moment compared to what we expected of him.
Stevie was so fast. That guy was always running the floor for dunks.
Matt Roe was a marginally good player at best.
Well, Greg "kid" kohls was pretty good. Imagine him w/ the three point line.Whereas I love CJ to death, for that 12 spot, an argument could be made (in no particular order) for Sweet D, Leo Rautins, GMac, Raf, Shumpert, (underrated) Dave Johnson, and probably a few more.
No problem with the first 11 (just their inclusion, not necessarily the order).
Raffael Addison was the best shooter in SU history. Unfortunately there was o 3 point line then.
Again you must be young. Your list could include players like Louis Orr, Dennis Duval, Dale shakelford and Eric Santifer
Matt Roe does not belong in the same sentence as GMAC. Matt Roe was slightly better than Trevor Cooney and that's about it.
Owens had 22 points on 9-19 shooting against Richmond. He did his job.
Raffael Addison was the best shooter in SU history. Unfortunately there was o 3 point line then.
Again you must be young. Your list could include players like Louis Orr, Dennis Duval, Dale shakelford and Eric Santifer