The casual fan has had the last 2-3 years to do that and they haven't. The ratings proved that while tiger was out
Why don't these pro's just hit irons all the way around? They can hit a 4 iron 250+ and don't have to worry about the fescue. It's the same course for everybody so Zach and Phil should stop crying. Got to deal with it and persevere.
Sorry, but if Phil had said the exact same thing as Zach, he'd be getting ripped by the same people who are ripping him today. Zach gets a pass because he's not a lightning rod, IMO. Players being unhappy with how the USGA sets up its Open courses is a long tradition. Phil didn't invent it. I would prefer they all just bite their tongues and play, but that's not realistic.
I don't necessarily agree with you but when you have the absolute best players in the world and not one of them is beating the course then you could argue that the course is too difficult.With each comment the pros make, it becomes harder to believe that they’re not spoiled by the relative easiness of the courses on the regular tour. I’m not saying every course ever week needs to be as tough as this one, but they all need to be tougher.
Please, I didn't fall for anything. This whole story is much ado about nothing, golf-style, and I find the reaction it is getting in some circles to be hilarious.And sorry, but I think if anyone but your hero Phil had pulled that act yesterday, he would have been DQed. I'm surprised at you for falling for his routine.
I don't think it's accurate to conclude nobody is beating the course. +3 after three rounds on a diabolical 7400 yard par 70 course is a fine score, particularly on a course set up for a U.S. Open.I don't necessarily agree with you but when you have the absolute best players in the world and not one of them is beating the course then you could argue that the course is too difficult.
I was thinking more along the lines of the 2000 US Open when Tiger won with a -12 and second place was +3. Tiger won the course that week. You are right thought that +3 at Shinnecock is a fine score and probably the best anyone would ever do through three rounds in those conditions, it's just that not one player, so far, has stood out and said this is his tournament to win.I don't think it's accurate to conclude nobody is beating the course. +3 after three rounds on a diabolical 7400 yard par 70 course is a fine score, particularly on a course set up for a U.S. Open.
The greens were difficult, but the really big numbers came from being in the deep fescue.I think it's the greens and pin placements more than the width of the fairways.
The greens were difficult, but the really big numbers came from being in the deep fescue.
Why don't these pro's just hit irons all the way around? They can hit a 4 iron 250+ and don't have to worry about the fescue. It's the same course for everybody so Zach and Phil should stop crying. Got to deal with it and persevere.
The greens were difficult, but the really big numbers came from being in the deep fescue.
Please, I didn't fall for anything. This whole story is much ado about nothing, golf-style, and I find the reaction it is getting in some circles to be hilarious.
I would have been okay with the USGA disqualifying him, as it was a judgment call based on how they chose to assess the incident and interpret the rules. They chose not to, and I believe they would have reached the same conclusion had it been any other player.
With each comment the pros make, it becoo believe that they’re not spoiled by the relative easiness of the courses on the regular tour. I’m not saying every course ever week needs to be as tough as this one, but they all need to be tougher.
There are several courses that are tough and fair. That was the case of Shinnecock on Thursday. But when the greens become baked, and pin placements are not appropriate like yesterday afternoon then we have moved from tough to unfair.
You are acting as if every course has a -20 type winner. Courses can be made tougher (and still be fair), but many after fine the way they are. Many are in the -5 to -10 vicinity for the winner which is a fine target.
That deprived him of a chance to win outright.And blowhard Johnny breathes a sigh of relief as he stays relevant for another year.
I don't think the width of the fairway was the problem for the players to hit, it was the ball kept running out and into the rough. They can't get any control over the ball out of the rough and then over the green it goes into more trouble with a dead chip coming back. I think you leave the driver and the woods in the bag and try to play for pars and not birdies.I think it's the greens and pin placements more than the width of the fairways.
Koepka’s putting is on Fire I like him to win at even.