Why would you expect me to argue any of your points when you are failing to do the courtesy of the same for me? When you are moving the goalposts all the time and attributing comments to me that I never made.
I clearly laid out 2 assumptions to compare the records of the two.
#1. I discounted 2 games because the top 3 in the Pac 12 play each other. Is that not fair. Is that wrong?
Yes or No.
#2.
Cal/USC/Stanford/Colorado/Utah is better than St. Mary's / BYU / San Francisco.
The head to head records are in favour of the WCC
The analytics are a draw.
So basically you are saying
a) I ignore the head to head records
b) I ignore the analytics
c) My eye test is better.
I guess the big difference in our arguments is that I didn't call you stupid.
Here's my very simple take. The top five teams (in terms of RPI) in the P-12 are 57-7 OOC. Three of those teams are considered amongst the ten most likely to win it all according to the oddsmakers in Vegas. Other than that the two leagues are quite similar.