Trueblue25
Cali Award Magistrate; 2023 Cali Award Rushing Yds
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2013
- Messages
- 40,597
- Like
- 83,309
Honestly the Big 12 may end up better off.
Big 12 making a final play to stay relevant. Has zero % chance of working. Even if you steal 6 PAC 12 schools, once the Big 10 or SEC comes calling for any of them (or any current Big 12 school) they will still jump.
All this does is kill the ACC quicker and make the Big 12 the solid #3 conference after the SEC and Big 10 split away.
What does it say about the ACC?
Taking SU and the Raiders out of the equation, I've prioritized the NFL over college football my whole life. Glad I made that decision.
Their numbers might work if they're using amounts from the suppressed value contract, that can also be figured out in court.That's the WVU guy who was wrong about pretty much everything the last two major conference realignments. Couscuse is a better source
Looking forward to annual matchups with Mansfield and HartfordThat they are in negotiations with the Patriot league.
It’s a short term play. Yes, they’ll be solid for now. They still won’t have much to offer the mega conferences: BYU, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, and Colorado.But it puts them in a solid #3 spot with this move. Hurts the ACC. That's what it is. They are trying to be the solid #3 conference overall (#1 conference in the NCAA after the BIG10/SEC leave the NCAA.)
Plus all of these schools moving is nice, but it literally means nothing. Arizona moves to the Big 12, great, IF the Big 10 eventually calls they will just jump to the Big 10. Money is too great and need to be in one of the 2 conferences that matter.
Their numbers might work if they're using amounts from the suppressed value contract, that can also be figured out in court.
This feels like jogging to your own funeral...
absolutely.Our competition here is not the SEC or the B10. They’re going to do what they do. Our competition is the B12. We want to be firmly at #3, and that means being in position to reinforce ourselves once the SEC and/or B10 pilfer a couple (few?) teams. Those conferences may have gleaned everything from the PAC and B12 that they covet. Once they set their sights on the ACC we want to be in position to remain #3.
And I no longer want to hear the “academics” argument. The conferences don’t care about academic$.
Seeing that USC and UCLA are actively trying to block Oregon and UW from joining the Big 10.
Bring them, Stanford and ND to the ACC damnit!
Big XII is sitting prettier than ACC. If B1G wants more, their target should be Cal, Standord, Oregon, Washington and Colorado. PAC12 leftovers have no option to merge into Big XII, including Arizona, Arizona St, Utah at least, maybe even Washington St and Oregon St. The latter two could go to Mountain West. ACC has reached maximal capacity without any worthy target in the region.Big XII may have thrown the ACC a solid by establishing a P4 if this goes down. (For now..)
Because he’s the smartest person in the room. Just ask himYikes bud, why are you taking this so personally? I’m just asking for your thoughts on why UNC would be an early target. Doesn’t even have to be you who responds, this is an open forum.
all joking aside, theres a lot of dumbass stupid opinions being thrown around in this room.Because he’s the smartest person in the room. Just ask him
There's the rub. No matter how you slice it, the B1G/SEC will covet more assets from the ACC than whatever's left of the Big 12/Pac-12. There are at least eight ACC teams in play, including ND.Our competition here is not the SEC or the B10. They’re going to do what they do. Our competition is the B12. We want to be firmly at #3, and that means being in position to reinforce ourselves once the SEC and/or B10 pilfer a couple (few?) teams. Those conferences may have gleaned everything from the PAC and B12 that they covet. Once they set their sights on the ACC we want to be in position to remain #3.
And I no longer want to hear the “academics” argument. The conferences don’t care about academic$.
push away and push it all right in the trash.There's the rub. No matter how you slice it, the B1G/SEC will covet more assets from the ACC than whatever's left of the Big 12/Pac-12. There are at least eight ACC teams in play, including ND.
That's why I'm pushing an ACC/Big East merger, including Kansas. Will be the best conference for basketball no matter what. The football division will have a decent product.
FOOTBALL/BASKETBALL DIVISION
Syracuse
Duke
Kansas
Louisville
Miami
Pitt
BC
Wake
UConn
WVU or Cincy
BASKETBALL DIVISION
Villanova
Georgetown
Providence
Seton Hall
St. John's
Marquette
Butler
DePaul
Creighton
Xavier
You're in full troll mode now.push away and push it all right in the trash.
iowa st v oregon st football will do better ratings than any hoop game you can match up from that list.
boy do i miss the headbang emoji...
Why don’t you think the ACC should be proactive in adding the best Pac 12 and Big 12 programs and markets, including, for instance, Oregon, Washington, Stanford, Arizona, ASU, Utah, Colorado, Kansas and two Texas schools? That could be the western division. Why should the ACC sit back and leave the poaching to the Big 12? We have the GOR.I don't think it does. Just more mouths to feed. There are a lot of meh schools the ACC could add that really wouldn't add much as well.
Our best shot at any sense of future is to goo...There's the rub. No matter how you slice it, the B1G/SEC will covet more assets from the ACC than whatever's left of the Big 12/Pac-12. There are at least eight ACC teams in play, including ND.
That's why I'm pushing an ACC/Big East merger, including Kansas. Will be the best conference for basketball no matter what. The football division will have a decent product.
FOOTBALL/BASKETBALL DIVISION
Syracuse
Duke
Kansas
Louisville
Miami
Pitt
BC
Wake
UConn
WVU or Cincy
BASKETBALL DIVISION
Villanova
Georgetown
Providence
Seton Hall
St. John's
Marquette
Butler
DePaul
Creighton
Xavier