Uh, ahead of Ucla?Us and UL should be 5 and 6 but the last 8 years have hurt
This is the kind of ranking that shows the stature with which Syracuse basketball is seen nationally and makes you believe we can attract a really good coach to take the baton from JB once he finally retires.Too 10 baby!
And when you see this you realize how much history and success this program has. Even with some mediocre years we are a national name.
Cuse!
They have 5 national titles, 3 of them came in my lifetime. They’re a legit top 10 brand.Indiana as a top 10 brand is still quite something given their last 20 yrs
They have 5 national titles, 3 of them came in my lifetime. They’re a legit top 10 brand.
That's where we are.Indiana as a top 10 brand is still quite something given their last 20 yrs
I’d put Cuse, Arizona, and Michigan State ahead of Gonzaga brand wise.
It's funny that people seem to see things both ways. Indiana shouldn't be on there because they haven't mattered much in 20 years. Gonzaga shouldn't be on there because they've only mattered for 20 years.144% THIS.
Gonzaga has done very well of late, but part of National #BRAND is sustained success over decades.
They’re a big fish in their meh,
non P5 conference.
The next time I see a random person wearing a Gonzaga T shirt will be the first.
It's funny that people seem to see things both ways. Indiana shouldn't be on there because they haven't mattered much in 20 years. Gonzaga shouldn't be on there because they've only mattered for 20 years.
That's where we are.
I’d guess he’s talking about our future as well unless the change is made thoughtfully.Your comparing our last 20 to theirs? Not even close. Our issues are the last 8. The 12 before that included 3 of the best teams in SU history.
I’d guess he’s talking about our future as well unless the change is made thoughtfully.
Their fan base, like ours, is rabid and strong enough to sustain the brand. They’ll be back again with the right coach. Even terrible Tom Crean had them nationally relevant for a 5-6 year period. They were a #1 seed when we beat them on the way to the Final Four in 2013.And they lean on those 5 heavily these days with having missed the tourney 8 times in the last 20 years, with 1 Final Four over that same time period. Takes a while for such brands to fade but overall they matter less and less every year.
Not at all. In our last 20 years we’ve won a National title, made two other Final Fours, an Elite Eight, several Sweet 16s, had two #1 tourney seeds, won three Big East conference championships, two conference tourney titles.That's where we are.
This is the kind of ranking that shows the stature with which Syracuse basketball is seen nationally and makes you believe we can attract a really good coach to take the baton from JB once he finally retires.
Not sure if Mike Woodson can coach, but IU's been recruiting very well since he was hired.
Not sure if Mike Woodson can coach, but IU's been recruiting very well since he was hired.
I think the key is that IU has a storied history. That helps perpetuate the brand regardless of recent history.It's funny that people seem to see things both ways. Indiana shouldn't be on there because they haven't mattered much in 20 years. Gonzaga shouldn't be on there because they've only mattered for 20 years.