CuseFaninVT
2023-24 Iggy Winner Leading Rebounder
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2012
- Messages
- 47,359
- Like
- 105,829
It wasn’t simultaneous. He hit the ground first, then the db ripped it away.
No, the rule is that a receiver has to survive the ground, not just have a moment of control. Think of it this way: if there was no defender there, and the ball went flying away after Cooks hit the ground, then no one would be claiming it was complete. We saw that happen a few times in yesterday's game. Those weren't fumbles because a receiver has to survive the ground.
In this case, the defender ripped the ball away simultaneous to Cooks hitting the ground. It was a very weird play, but the refs got it right.