Wide Receiver Issue | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

Wide Receiver Issue

I get your point...but, IMO, this has far more to do with the pitcher than it does with the catcher(s).

Example: In 2018 opposing coaches often mentioned that they game planned to keep the ball out of Riley's hands. All of a sudden, in 2019, it was posted here numerous times that he's too small, he sucks etc. It was blatantly clear to me that TD had developed a close relationship with T Jackson during his RS year. TJ was, almost exclusively, TD's primary target regardless of the defense. This helped lead to some of Taj's frustration and eventual outbursts. In some ways, I don't blame Taj.

For me, the bottom line is that TD rarely makes the correct call at the LOS and if his predetermined 1st target is covered he panics. In his defense, the OL was so bad last year he rarely had time to run through his progressions which only highlights the importance of making the correct pre-snap read and take what the D gives him.
Spot on, he made a great throw to C Jackson in the rutgers game. The only reason being he got no pressure it was under 10 yards and jackson was open from the second the ball was snapped. Taj doesn't know how to behave but TD should have had tons of success with T jackson and harris in 19. His stats from 2019 were not bad at all but those of us who actually watched the games know how bad of an overall QB he is.
 
I am really hoping that alot of these freshman backups who were pretty sought after guys in high school hope can step up and really take advantage of the scheme cause Harris can't do it by himself! These other receivers don't have it
 
Wide Receiver has been an issue for years. That should tell us we need a run based O and running QB. Yes, that will be less exciting to watch but going 7-6 is better than 4-8. Look at what we have had the last 18 years. I would say close to 1/3 of those years we don't have a good #1. And another 1/3 we only have a #1 but no #2. I would say 2012, 2015, and 2016 were the only years we legit had 3 guys.

Top 3 WRs in yards by year:

2004- Jared Jones, Steven Gregory, Andre Fontenette
2005- Rice Moss, Tim Lane, Nick Chestnut
2006- Mike Williams, Rice Moss, Taj Smith
2007- Mike Williams, Taj Smith, Rice Moss
2008- Donte Davis, Lavar Lobdell, Marcus Sales
2009- Mike Williams, Marcus Sales, Alec Lemon
2010- Van Chew, Marcus Sales, Alec Lemon
2011- Alec Lemon, Van Chew, Dorian Graham
2012- Alec Lemon, Marcus Sales, Jared West
2013- Ashton Broyld, Jarod West, Chris Clark
2014- Jarod West, Steve Ishmael, Ben Lewis
2015- Steve Ishmael, Brisly Estime, Erv Philips
2016- Amba Etta-Tawo, Erv philips, Steve Ismael
2017- Steve Ishmael, Erv Philips, Devin Butler
2018- Jamal Custis, Sean Riley, Taj Harris
2019- Trishton Jackson, Taj Harris, Sean Riley
2020- Taj Harris, Anthony Queeley, Nykeim Johnson
2021- Taj Harris, Anthony Queeley, Sharod Johnson
Blah - agree it's been not great. But moving to a running focused attack when you have the dome seems dumb. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Dino might not be the guy to get the passing attack right - but it doesn't mean it's the wrong tact.

Plus, Shafer basically morphed us into an option running team and it stunk.
 
Blah - agree it's been not great. But moving to a running focused attack when you have the dome seems dumb. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Dino might not be the guy to get the passing attack right - but it doesn't mean it's the wrong tact.

Plus, Shafer basically morphed us into an option running team and it stunk.
Shafer sucked. That doesn't change the fact that we have had one passing QB in the 2000s. We have struggled to get quality WRs. Sure having a Dome is great for passing but we cannot get the horses. Tailoring the team to what you can get makes more sense.

***Edit
How often is weather really a factor on O outdoors anyway? If anything the biggest advantage for the Dome is on D.
 
Shafer sucked. That doesn't change the fact that we have had one passing QB in the 2000s. We have struggled to get quality WRs. Sure having a Dome is great for passing but we cannot get the horses. Tailoring the team to what you can get makes more sense.

***Edit
How often is weather really a factor on O outdoors anyway? If anything the biggest advantage for the Dome is on D.
I'd prefer trying to upgrade the talent over going run-heavy. It's not like OL has been Wisconsin and we can build a great run offense. Unless, you want to go triple option which is a whole other discussion.
 
Blah - agree it's been not great. But moving to a running focused attack when you have the dome seems dumb. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Dino might not be the guy to get the passing attack right - but it doesn't mean it's the wrong tact.

Plus, Shafer basically morphed us into an option running team and it stunk.
Eh, well you're wrong again. I heard this crap when P was fired, and we got the WCO and Grob, turned to a more NE based strong D/pro-style with Marrone and it fixed things. As for Shafer, I get it, he lit a cigar in the dome but people are stubborn. Fact is Shafer brought us Dungey, Erv, Ish, etc. Shafer was snake-bit when it came to injuries. He was playing with his 4th string QB that last year. How has ANY other SU coach done when playing a 4th string QB. Dino can't win with a 1st string QB. Also Marrone's recuriting sucked and it takes years for guys to move through the system. I still think Shafer only getting 3 years while using a walk-on 4th string QB was BS but guys like you wanted a passing offense tailored to the Dome. Well here it is, I think, I'm not sure we even have an offense.

We need an offense that can move the ball in the dome whether it's through the air or not. BTW, only 1/2 our games are in the Dome, so you're trying to run an offensive philosophy that we can't recruit for, that will give you a slight advantage in only 1/2 of your games.
 
I'd prefer trying to upgrade the talent over going run-heavy. It's not like OL has been Wisconsin and we can build a great run offense. Unless, you want to go triple option which is a whole other discussion.
That's fine. I'd prefer to win games and not be a laughing stock. Literally we've brought in these types of offenses twice and both times have resulted in our worst teams. Dino and Grob, Baylor and WCO, I'm so freaking over it. Power pro-style football with strong defense is what wins in the Dome, not always but a hell of alot more than trying to be someone we're not like Baylor(TX Talent) or USC.
 
I'd prefer trying to upgrade the talent over going run-heavy. It's not like OL has been Wisconsin and we can build a great run offense. Unless, you want to go triple option which is a whole other discussion.
I would too but it ain't happening. Our peer struggle to consistently have quality passing QBs and quality WRs. So why would it be different here? Heck top programs struggle to find good QBs.

If you have a HC with a good eye for it there are plenty of diamonds in the sky for the OL. And you can coach up an OL. Look at what Marrone left Shafer. That is why we made a Bowl. The Dazzler was the same way at BC. He found the OL guys.
 
Shafer sucked. That doesn't change the fact that we have had one passing QB in the 2000s. We have struggled to get quality WRs. Sure having a Dome is great for passing but we cannot get the horses. Tailoring the team to what you can get makes more sense.

***Edit
How often is weather really a factor on O outdoors anyway? If anything the biggest advantage for the Dome is on D.
Paulus, Nassib, Devito. I count 3. May be others.
 
We gave up on tempo because the oline was awful. this style of D where we play lots of people is fine . last yr the D was fine most of the games we just couldnt get an offense to move the ball.

first half last week
drive 1 grounding penalty
drive 2 moved the ball Taj fumble call
drive 3 moved the ball Benson holding call At worst we had 2 fg attempts
drive 4 first down but formation penalty
drive 5 punt
drive 6 missed fg

so 3 of 6 we had 10 play drives to the 20-30 yd line. Not awful but Ok, but 4 drives stalled out by dubious calls by the refs. Not a great leap to 9 -13 pts and we got zero

2nd half was worse
drive 1 punt
drive 2 TD
drive 3 punt
drive 4 punt
drive 5 punt
drive 6 fumble
drive 7 punt
drive 8 INt

thats ugly 1 of 8 acceptable.. what changed.. we started passing on every first down.. had a sack/fumble/inc on every one. ended up in 3rd and long all half.
 
Paulus, Nassib, Devito. I count 3. May be others.

Devito is a passing QB and he was rated but he stinks. Nassib wasn't rated, but was good. Paulus was rated but played Basketball instead. Had he played Football maybe he would have been better. The only good passing QB we have had in the 2000s has been Nassib.
 
We gave up on tempo because the oline was awful. this style of D where we play lots of people is fine . last yr the D was fine most of the games we just couldnt get an offense to move the ball.

first half last week
drive 1 grounding penalty
drive 2 moved the ball Taj fumble call
drive 3 moved the ball Benson holding call At worst we had 2 fg attempts
drive 4 first down but formation penalty
drive 5 punt
drive 6 missed fg

so 3 of 6 we had 10 play drives to the 20-30 yd line. Not awful but Ok, but 4 drives stalled out by dubious calls by the refs. Not a great leap to 9 -13 pts and we got zero

2nd half was worse
drive 1 punt
drive 2 TD
drive 3 punt
drive 4 punt
drive 5 punt
drive 6 fumble
drive 7 punt
drive 8 INt

thats ugly 1 of 8 acceptable.. what changed.. we started passing on every first down.. had a sack/fumble/inc on every one. ended up in 3rd and long all half.
Drive 1 was Taj's drop. We abandoned the run in the 2nd half and we had no reason to. We got the ball back with momentum at 7-7 and went three and out. Unacceptable.
 
System aside, you’ve got to play the hand you’re dealt. Right now, our run game seems like it gives us our best chance of success. Opposing teams know this and stack the box, but I think we have to run until we can develop the other facets of the offense. Albany should provide us with the chance to try both. But it shouldn’t distract us from the reality that we are probably a run to set up the pass team. And as someone said a few times here, that should give us some play action opportunities.
 
System aside, you’ve got to play the hand you’re dealt. Right now, our run game seems like it gives us our best chance of success. Opposing teams know this and stack the box, but I think we have to run until we can develop the other facets of the offense. Albany should provide us with the chance to try both. But it shouldn’t distract us from the reality that we are probably a run to set up the pass team. And as someone said a few times here, that should give us some play action opportunities.
If we play the running QB the D can't focus on Tucker. It keeps them honest.
 
Devito is a passing QB and he was rated but he stinks. Nassib wasn't rated, but was good. Paulus was rated but played Basketball instead. Had he played Football maybe he would have been better. The only good passing QB we have had in the 2000s has been Nassib.
I don’t disagree with any of that. But if you’re going to factor in effectiveness, Dungey as a passer chalked up nearly 10,000 yards. So…
 
System aside, you’ve got to play the hand you’re dealt. Right now, our run game seems like it gives us our best chance of success. Opposing teams know this and stack the box, but I think we have to run until we can develop the other facets of the offense. Albany should provide us with the chance to try both. But it shouldn’t distract us from the reality that we are probably a run to set up the pass team. And as someone said a few times here, that should give us some play action opportunities.
Or we could like throw to the TE over the top of the cheating LBs so they aren't pinning their ears back looking for the run to loosen things up. I mean if you want DeLeone 3 yds and a cloud of dust, I'm sorta ok with that but we have to get to 3 yards first, I think we're only at 2 right now. I see a lot of 2nd and 8, 3rd and 8 type of plays from us. Running into a stacked box is not the answer. Using the middle of the field and TE's and PA passing is.
 
Have we played a stacked box yet? I see a lot of 5-6 in the box. We dont have to run every play up the middle either.. lets use the sides a bit more.. I miss sweeps. Maybe use the WRs a couple times, not 7-8 like Rutgers but some. Move the D around.. If you want to use Shrader then do it..

I dont see wrs beating any man coverage which is the main issue other than a few slants and some deep balls. teams pretty much can man us up and then zone us in 3rd and long all day. We need to run better so teams have to load the box and then we can mix it up.

if you want to throw on first down then it needs to play action or plays that create positive yardage.
 
That is stuff is on the HC and recruiting.

I give.Scott Shafer a hard time but finding guys like Erv Philips and Steve Ishmael every year shouldn’t be hard.
Shafer didn’t find enough.
Dino hasn’t found any. We had Michigan State transfer, Maryland transfer he can’t find HS guys.

That is on the coaching staff.
I know this is speculative, but I think Dino found a faster Erv. But he decided to transfer to Louisville.
 
Have we played a stacked box yet? I see a lot of 5-6 in the box. We dont have to run every play up the middle either.. lets use the sides a bit more.. I miss sweeps. Maybe use the WRs a couple times, not 7-8 like Rutgers but some. Move the D around.. If you want to use Shrader then do it..

I dont see wrs beating any man coverage which is the main issue other than a few slants and some deep balls. teams pretty much can man us up and then zone us in 3rd and long all day. We need to run better so teams have to load the box and then we can mix it up.

if you want to throw on first down then it needs to play action or plays that create positive yardage.
And on 3rd and short or medium don't throw a low percentage deep ball down the sideline to a covered WR (not specific to this year, more the previous couple).
 
Eh, well you're wrong again. I heard this crap when P was fired, and we got the WCO and Grob, turned to a more NE based strong D/pro-style with Marrone and it fixed things. As for Shafer, I get it, he lit a cigar in the dome but people are stubborn. Fact is Shafer brought us Dungey, Erv, Ish, etc. Shafer was snake-bit when it came to injuries. He was playing with his 4th string QB that last year. How has ANY other SU coach done when playing a 4th string QB. Dino can't win with a 1st string QB. Also Marrone's recuriting sucked and it takes years for guys to move through the system. I still think Shafer only getting 3 years while using a walk-on 4th string QB was BS but guys like you wanted a passing offense tailored to the Dome. Well here it is, I think, I'm not sure we even have an offense.

We need an offense that can move the ball in the dome whether it's through the air or not. BTW, only 1/2 our games are in the Dome, so you're trying to run an offensive philosophy that we can't recruit for, that will give you a slight advantage in only 1/2 of your games.
Your citing Greg Robinsons offense as proof of anything at all made my eyes glaze over. Dino *was* successful with a tempo based offense at doing things Shafer had wet dreams about. The offense now doesn’t resemble that offense and that’s why we are even asking the question about what might work going forward.

Is your prevailing thought that every other team in college football can figure out a pass 1st modern football approach but we can’t?!

If you want to have an athletic QB who can run too? Fine. But a run first mentality needs OL which we’ve had a hard time getting too?
 
Or we could like throw to the TE over the top of the cheating LBs so they aren't pinning their ears back looking for the run to loosen things up. I mean if you want DeLeone 3 yds and a cloud of dust, I'm sorta ok with that but we have to get to 3 yards first, I think we're only at 2 right now. I see a lot of 2nd and 8, 3rd and 8 type of plays from us. Running into a stacked box is not the answer. Using the middle of the field and TE's and PA passing is.
I would categorize those passes to the TE as play action opportunities. Agree we should utilize them. Set up by the run game.
 
I don’t disagree with any of that. But if you’re going to factor in effectiveness, Dungey as a passer chalked up nearly 10,000 yards. So…
All time passing leaders…

993B19BB-EE36-4E1F-BDB4-1CF32793131B.jpeg
 
A lot of comments on this thread is why I am tired of people thinking that just because we play in the Dome means we should be an over the top passing, air raid-type offense. Historically, Syracuse Football has been most successful when we had a power running game with option principles including a mobile QB.

You need to formulate your plan based on what recruits you can GET. I am not sure how realistic it is for us to get top tier skill talent anymore. We need to find those diamonds in the rough like a few of you have mentioned like Alec Lemon, Mike Williams, Erv Phillips, etc...

If you love CFB like I do, watch Coastal Carolina. I'd love to see that offense in the Dome!
 
Eh, well you're wrong again. I heard this crap when P was fired, and we got the WCO and Grob, turned to a more NE based strong D/pro-style with Marrone and it fixed things. As for Shafer, I get it, he lit a cigar in the dome but people are stubborn. Fact is Shafer brought us Dungey, Erv, Ish, etc. Shafer was snake-bit when it came to injuries. He was playing with his 4th string QB that last year. How has ANY other SU coach done when playing a 4th string QB. Dino can't win with a 1st string QB. Also Marrone's recuriting sucked and it takes years for guys to move through the system. I still think Shafer only getting 3 years while using a walk-on 4th string QB was BS but guys like you wanted a passing offense tailored to the Dome. Well here it is, I think, I'm not sure we even have an offense.

We need an offense that can move the ball in the dome whether it's through the air or not. BTW, only 1/2 our games are in the Dome, so you're trying to run an offensive philosophy that we can't recruit for, that will give you a slight advantage in only 1/2 of your games.
Shafer would have had Dungey for more games in 2015 if he didn't leave him in the game against Louisville down 4 TDs with 8 minutes left because "we still had a shot to win". He was given only 3 years because the guy who hired him was sent packing and his new boss watched him melt down in a series of "We're 3-0! 3-0!" and ISIS press conferences, bugging Coyle for an extension while losing 8 straight after the "3-0" start. Shafer got what he deserved, no matter how things turn out with Dino. Like PP in 2004. it was time for him to go, we just should have never replaced him with a dope like GROB, doesn't mean firing him was a mistake.
 

Similar threads

    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Wednesday for Football
Replies
1
Views
1K
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Monday for Football
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
501
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Tuesday for Football
Replies
4
Views
753

Forum statistics

Threads
171,797
Messages
4,977,037
Members
6,020
Latest member
OldeOstrom

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
3,459
Total visitors
3,557


...
Top Bottom