Surely somehow this date relates to 44, or something to do with Syracuse.
You're always the voice of (true) reason...Not what I had in mind but yes, plausible...So he forgot Syracuse and added it in at the last minute?
Maybe he did it alphabetically and decided to move one school out of order to mess with the heads of fans from 10 schools
I got it. 26th day of 7th month, so 2+(6x7) = 44. It's so simple it brilliant. Clever young man.Surely somehow this date relates to 44, or something to do with Syracuse.
And this is why I keep going back to wondering if Acosta is stretched too thin covering Florida too. Not as much attention being paid to NJ, or are we just not as high on prospects there?Man, he couldnt even put CUSE in there. Temple instead. That hurts. As much as Acosta is doing in NJ its still disapointing that he feels more connecting with Temple than SU.
Womp womp
Yep. Rutgers is a weird school to include.Michigan, South Carolina, Rutgers, Temple.
One of these things is not like the others.
And this is why I keep going back to wondering if Acosta is stretched too thin covering Florida too. Not as much attention being paid to NJ, or are we just not as high on prospects there?
What instability? Not one person from the Hill has said that SS is in danger. Not one. Other schools don't have to negatively recruit against us in football. Our record the last 15 years has that covered.The instability with our coaching staff has to be a huge factor.
Just too many turning their backs on us.
dasher said:What instability? Not one person from the Hill has said that SS is in danger. Not one. Other schools don't have to negatively recruit against us in football. Our record the last 15 years has that covered.
It doesn't help that Shafer is constantly mentioned by the national media as being on the hot seat, despite the fact his job has never been speculated about at SU.Our record has created a perception among recruits of instability.
No one on the Hill has to mention a thing.
It's just there.
jekelish said:It doesn't help that Shafer is constantly mentioned by the national media as being on the hot seat, despite the fact his job has never been speculated about at SU.
When do administrations ever speculate about the job status of coaches? Except the dreaded vote of confidence.It doesn't help that Shafer is constantly mentioned by the national media as being on the hot seat, despite the fact his job has never been speculated about at SU.
It doesn't help that Shafer is constantly mentioned by the national media as being on the hot seat, despite the fact his job has never been speculated about at SU.