By who? If the staff thought the guys behind him were better, they probably would have been playing more this past year.because he was going to be replaced on the depth chart? 29 catches is easily replaceable
By who? If the staff thought the guys behind him were better, they probably would have been playing more this past year.
By who? If the staff thought the guys behind him were better, they probably would have been playing more this past year.
By who? If the staff thought the guys behind him were better, they probably would have been playing more this past year.
I thought Alford was our best blocking WR. He was our third leading receiver in yards and TDs. He was a starter. He was able bodied. There is no heir apparent.
His transferring would be a loss. Not an insurmountable loss, but a loss none the less. Teams with lesser talent really can't afford to hemorrhage any talent (though it is inevitable).
Kind of like with the NFL combine - do you want guys who pass the look test or have shown they can actually produce?Measurables at the Wr are great but I always go back to Sales and Lemon. Take those two all day. Knew how to get open
The heir apparent is Isaiah Jones, who is also a bigger receiver.
Yep, like I said, maybe he flourishes going forward. Maybe he doesn't. There's a reason he's leaving and its weird that it has happened 2 weeks after the bowl game.Jamal Custis didn't take off until his last season. Everyone doesn't hit the ground running.
He also won a game for us as aHe dropped as many passes as he caught.
He has been at SU for 3 years and was not a true freshman when he made that catch against VT.He also won a game for us as a true freshman (at VT) with a last-minute long TD catch that only he was equipped to catch among those on our roster (he used his height/wing-span to reach over the trailing defender on a slightly underthrown ball from Shrader).
I get it. He's not an A-A in waiting. But he is way more likely to get better with each passing year. Most do, especially kids from Canada, who have not played as much football. I really don't see how this departure makes the program better. At least not directly. I don't get the "whatever, he was decent" vibe that some (many?) have here?
This was an evolving wideout with significant upside to improve.
I agree that Jones will start, but he probably would have started alongside Alford. That would given us 2 big, athletic receivers. I do like Hatcher, but like Hatcher AND Alford better.The week 1 depth chart was Alford OR Jones and it was trending Jones.
Through the first 3 games (before Jones got hurt) he was 4-60 and 1 TD. Alford was 1-47 and 1 TD. Not a lot of difference but Jones was being targeted and like I said it was trending Jones and seemed obvious. This is Jones' job to lose if he's healthy.
That's not true, Dino often times values experience over raw skill. We've seen it a lot with his personnel decisions. How many times has a starter been injured, the backup comes in and we say "who the hell is this guy and where has he been?". I for one have been begging to see Umari Hatcher on a consistent basis.
I'm calling it now, Umari Hatcher is next years break out.
I loved Alford's size and was always hoping he'd have his Jamaal Custis moment, but sometimes big and athletic, isn't enough.
I don't see this as a loss the same way I see Ja'had Carter as a loss.
Yep, your going to lose players to the portal becauseHe has been at SU for 3 years and was not a true freshman when he made that catch against VT.
I didn’t see anyone saying the program will be better without him, maybe I missed it, but most are saying his production so far was limited and so it should be replaceable.
At this point with the portal, why have anything more than a whatever vibe. I think most agree it is disappointing, but not much we can do about it and it will happen over and over again for the foreseeable future. The sky is falling vibe doesn’t help.
I agree that Jones will start, but he probably would have started alongside Alford. That would given us 2 big, athletic receivers. I do like Hatcher, but like Hatcher AND Alford better.
Adams and jonesMy breakout guy is D'Marcus Adams. It seemed like every time he was in, he was behind the defense. Shrader needs to hit him on those routes, but to me, it seemed like he was open downfield, A LOT.
All coaches do this. You cant play a kid just because he has more talent. They need to know everything about the offense and build continuity or else you get a lot of mistakes that can cause the whole unit to be dysfunctional. There's different reasons why players don't get on the field. It could be cognitive issues, behavioral, selfishness, etc..That's not true, Dino often times values experience over raw skill. We've seen it a lot with his personnel decisions. How many times has a starter been injured, the backup comes in and we say "who the hell is this guy and where has he been?".
Yep, the timing is telling, imo. Grades come to mind immediately.I say either grades came into play or someone else is transferring in. And if not the latter, the coaches need to make the latter happen pronto.
yawn...lather, rinse, repeat. Yet another clown post.If our QB was more accurate and targeted him more I doubt he leaves,
GS does some nice things but its infurating how badly he misses on some throws. But even if a WR is wide open and has to make a diving acrobatic catch and can't get any YAC posters on here act like its still a great throw.
This sucks.