cuseincincy
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,620
- Like
- 6,509
Does calling Alford a TE mean he is going to lining up in a traditional "tight" position and have traditional TE blocking assignments? If not I don't see the point of calling him a TE. Is someone afraid of the 4 WR set so they call one of them a TE? Just seems weird to me. But I don't care what they call anyone as long as Alford and Gadsden each get plenty of targets. And that our scheme doesn't end up with one of those guys matched up on a DE.Complete guesses here on my part, but I'm going to say Jackson & Gadsen are our top 2 leading pass catchers. I think Cooper will have a nice role in the slot and catch a decent amount of balls. Also see Queeley being solid possession guy, but nothing spectacular.
The interesting guy to me is Alford. Depending on where he lines up (TE or WR) probably determines the number of targets he gets. I think he's too big a target not to be productive. We saw glimpses (and so did VT). I'm hoping he continues to get better and all we saw last year is the tip of the iceberg. I have Jamal Custis flashbacks. Hopefully he gets to Sr. year Custis level well before his Sr year, ideally this year.