raf4488
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,896
- Like
- 3,519
I thought this was an interesting part of the agreement:
Why was it included that WVU "specifically" had to help Pitt and SU schedule, when they're leaving the conference in a year anyway? Why not specifically help UConn/Rutgers/USF/etc. schedule, since they're committed long term?
If I had to speculate, I'd say this was included because the BE fears a lawsuit from Pitt/SU, and/or Pitt and SU leaving the league for fall 2012. Otherwise, why single out the 2 schools who would prefer to leave ASAP?
WVU "will use its reasonable best efforts to help Big East members schedule additional football games for the 2012-13 season." Specifically, WVU will help Pitt and Syracuse schedule a Big 12 opponent provided the two schools make a request by today (Feb. 15). However, if the Big East finds a football member for the 2012 season, that rids WVU of all scheduling matchmaker responsibility.
Why was it included that WVU "specifically" had to help Pitt and SU schedule, when they're leaving the conference in a year anyway? Why not specifically help UConn/Rutgers/USF/etc. schedule, since they're committed long term?
If I had to speculate, I'd say this was included because the BE fears a lawsuit from Pitt/SU, and/or Pitt and SU leaving the league for fall 2012. Otherwise, why single out the 2 schools who would prefer to leave ASAP?