orangepassion
Nunzio Prophet
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 10,206
- Like
- 20,889
UCLA the only one left
Blue Bloods
- Thread starter orangepassion
- Start date
ssbriefcase
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 8,416
- Like
- 19,054
Haven't in a long time. I guess we could go back to once named one, are you always?
OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 215,645
- Like
- 375,995
donniesyracuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,209
- Like
- 13,049
Tell her life is too short for bad acting and bad writing.
donniesyracuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,209
- Like
- 13,049
CBS probably does not agree.
sufandu
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 14,481
- Like
- 22,243
To me a blue blood has to have had considerable success with more than one coach. Kentucky, Duke, UNC, and Kansas have all had that. UCLA and Indiana have had blips outside of their legends but nothing significant. If UCLA can keep going what they have now, that could change.
Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 45,063
- Like
- 127,076
Not sure Duke necessarily applies to this. Duke won all their titles and went to 13 of their 17 final fours under one coach. Most of their success was under K.
Yeah UCLA has won a Natty without Wooden, and has had how many coaches take them to a Final Four? They are ahead of Duke
Cusefan0307
Red recruits the ACC!
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2011
- Messages
- 45,063
- Like
- 127,076
East Coast Bias
sufandu
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 14,481
- Like
- 22,243
Sure, coach K elevated them, but 4 final fours prior to his arrival is also impressive.
Col. Bleep
All American
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2011
- Messages
- 4,808
- Like
- 8,952
Wait...gotta give Scheyer more than one season to do something.
Notwithstanding the fact that he had tremendous new talent tis year.
OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 215,645
- Like
- 375,995
The ACC was one of the few that had a league tournament at the time (i.e., the champion could change post season and the regular season champ was sol).
OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 215,645
- Like
- 375,995
That was the risk you took for staging a conference tournament back then.
You made extra ticket and TV revenue, but your top team might get bounced.
Maryland was the #3 team in the country in 1974, but they got upset by NC State in the ACCT.
jncuse
I brought the Cocaine to the White House
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,144
- Like
- 32,701
Except Duke for me.
jncuse
I brought the Cocaine to the White House
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,144
- Like
- 32,701
To me its a balance of historical and modern day.
I only have 4 clear cut - UNC, UK, Duke, Kansas.
Even if Duke's history is shorter, its still been 40 years at this point.
UCLA is close because they do not have quite enough modern day dominance in my view.
Indiana is out.
Using modern day criteria, we need to get it going soon under Red to maintain our tier 2 status.
I only have 4 clear cut - UNC, UK, Duke, Kansas.
Even if Duke's history is shorter, its still been 40 years at this point.
UCLA is close because they do not have quite enough modern day dominance in my view.
Indiana is out.
Using modern day criteria, we need to get it going soon under Red to maintain our tier 2 status.
Nicknack
All Conference
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 3,580
- Like
- 10,843
Since it's inception, the term blueblood has been very subjective and fluid. Teams considered a blueblood 80+ years ago isn't the same as today. It's also not the same person to person, except probably for UNC, Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky. When I think of blueblood, it's these four.
Similar threads
